---
title: "AIKO vs Daxieworld - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Daxieworld solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-daxieworld"
---

# AIKO vs Daxieworld

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 17 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Daxieworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Shanghai |  |
| Founded | 2009 |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |  |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Daxieworld | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 17 | +127 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 535 W | +270 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 466 W | +116 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Daxieworld | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 21.61% | +3.59 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 19.47% | +4.18 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Daxieworld | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.372%/°C | +0.101 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +4.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Daxieworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 15 (88.2%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (5.9%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (5.9%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Daxieworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 2 (11.8%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 10 (58.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 5 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (59%)


| Technology | AIKO | Daxieworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 10 (58.8%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 7 (41.2%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Daxieworld


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AOX-144M10FL 535W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-535w) | 535 | 20.1 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AOX-144M10FL 530W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-530w) | 530 | 19.9 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AOX-144M10FL 525W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w) | 525 | 19.7 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AOX-144M10FL 520W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w) | 520 | 19.5 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DX500W-30M](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-dx500w-30m) | 500 | 21.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AOX-132M10FL 485W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w) | 485 | 19.8 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AOX-132M10FL 480W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-480w) | 480 | 19.6 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AOX-132M10FL 475W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-475w) | 475 | 19.4 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AOX-132M10FL 470W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w) | 470 | 19.2 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AOX-132M10FL 465W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-465w) | 465 | 19.0 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Daxieworld is a Shenzhen-based Chinese manufacturer, operating as a brand of Shenzhen Daxie Technology Co., Ltd, a smaller integrated enterprise with around 100 employees and a compact factory footprint. It is not currently listed on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 rankings and its production scale is far below the industry's major players, positioning it as a niche or OEM-oriented supplier serving export markets across the Middle East, Africa, Australia and the Americas. AIKO, by contrast, is a larger, more established Chinese manufacturer that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2024 and has scaled rapidly, moving from roughly 20 GW of annual production capacity in early 2025 to over 35 GW by mid-2026, placing it among the top ten global module makers. On institutional footprint, AIKO is clearly the stronger and more bankable name, with financing recognized by multiple commercial banks across multiple projects.

Daxieworld's catalog centers on smaller-scale, budget-oriented products including solar street lights, storage batteries, inverters and PERC or flexible-panel modules in roughly the 390W to 535W range, suited to off-grid, residential, or OEM-branded projects rather than utility-scale deployment. AIKO has built its identity around N-type ABC (all-back-contact) cell technology, a premium approach that removes front-side busbars for higher efficiency and yield, with recent modules reaching 25-26 percent efficiency and power classes up to 690W, aimed at residential rooftops, commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and utility-scale projects.

For a typical buyer in 2025 seeking a bankable, well-documented product backed by independent financing track record and cutting-edge cell technology, AIKO is the stronger default choice, particularly for larger installations where long-term performance data and lender confidence matter. Daxieworld may still suit smaller, budget-conscious or off-grid projects, but buyers should treat it as a niche or OEM option rather than a like-for-like alternative to a Tier 1 manufacturer.

\---LINKS---

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves Tier 1 status from BloombergNEF \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/06/10/aiko-showcases-690-w-back-contact-solar-module-with-25-6-efficiency/ \| AIKO showcases 690 W back-contact module with 25.6% efficiency \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/06/aiko-offers-500-w-all-back-contact-solar-modules-for-ci-applications/ \| AIKO offers 500 W all-back-contact modules for C&I applications \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/daxieworld \| Daxieworld Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar Panels Review \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Daxieworld](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-daxieworld)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Daxieworld](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-daxieworld)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Daxieworld](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-daxieworld)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-daxieworld

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.