--- title: "AIKO vs CELLINE - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO vs CELLINE solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-celline" --- # AIKO vs CELLINE AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AIKO | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | | | Headquarters | Shanghai | | | Founded | 2009 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | SZSE: 600732 | | | Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | | Celline is a brand of small-wattage photovoltaic modules (10W–40W) primarily sold in Poland, targeting off-grid and low-power applications. Their panels feature monocrystalline cells on a rigid composite frame with anti-reflective glass and are distributed through Polish solar equipment retailers. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AIKO | CELLINE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 144 | 0 | +144 | | Max Power | 805 W | 0 W | +805 W | | Avg Power | 581 W | 0 W | +581 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AIKO | CELLINE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AIKO | CELLINE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AIKO | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | AIKO | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) | Technology | AIKO | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 | | Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AIKO is a Chinese solar module manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Guangzhou, China. It achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and had approximately 20 GW of annual production capacity as of early 2025, placing it among the mid-to-upper tier of global module producers. CELLINE, by contrast, returned no results in any major industry database, trade press outlet, or bankability list consulted during this research. It is not possible to verify its country of origin, founding date, annual output, or Tier 1 standing from publicly available sources, which means AIKO carries a substantially stronger and better-documented institutional footprint. AIKO's commercial identity is built around its proprietary N-type all-back-contact (ABC) cell architecture, which it has been scaling aggressively. Its residential and commercial product lines have reached verified efficiencies above 24% in mass production, confirmed by independent test houses such as TUV Nord. The Navigator and Comet series are positioned as premium rooftop and commercial rooftop options, backed by a 30-year performance warranty that is among the more generous in the market. Given the absence of any documented product information for CELLINE, a meaningful technology or product-family comparison between the two brands cannot be made. For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the only verifiable choice of the two. Its BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, documented production scale, and strong installer feedback - particularly in the Australian and UK markets - make it a credible premium option where budget allows. CELLINE cannot be recommended or dismissed on the basis of publicly available evidence, and any procurement decision involving that brand should be preceded by independent due diligence on its corporate standing, certifications, and warranty backing. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/09/aiko-unveils-back-contact-solar-module-with-fully-intelligent-integration/ \| Aiko unveils back-contact solar module with fully intelligent integration \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11 GW capacity upgrade \| article \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/19/aiko-achieves-24-8-efficiency-in-commercial-solar-module-production/ \| Aiko achieves 24.8% efficiency in commercial module production \| article \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes installers choice \| review Sources: \- \[Aiko unveils back-contact solar module with fully intelligent integration\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/09/aiko-unveils-back-contact-solar-module-with-fully-intelligent-integration/) \- \[Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade\](https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/) \- \[Aiko achieves 24.8% efficiency in commercial solar module production\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/19/aiko-achieves-24-8-efficiency-in-commercial-solar-module-production/) \- \[Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs CELLINE](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-celline) - [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs CELLINE](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-celline) - [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs CELLINE](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-celline) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-celline Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.