---
title: "AIKO vs Bruk-Bet - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Bruk-Bet solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-bruk-bet"
---

# AIKO vs Bruk-Bet

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 20 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Bruk-Bet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Poland |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Nieciecza |
| Founded | 2009 | 1984 |
| Employees |  | 1000+ |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl](http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl) |

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Bruk-Bet | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 20 | +124 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 480 W | +325 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 416 W | +165 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Bruk-Bet | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 22.17% | +3.03 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 20.80% | +2.85 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Bruk-Bet | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.324%/°C | +0.054 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 4 (20%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 26.5 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Bruk-Bet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 2 (10.0%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 11 (55.0%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 5 (25.0%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 2 (10.0%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Bruk-Bet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 7 (35.0%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 13 (65.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | AIKO | Bruk-Bet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 3 (15.0%) |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 15 (75.0%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 2 (10.0%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Bruk-Bet


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PEM.GB-480 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480-n-type) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PEM.GB-480](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PEM.GB-470 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470-n-type) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PEM.GB-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PEM.WB-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-465) | 465 | 21.3 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PEM.WB-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PEM.WS-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PEM.WS-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-455) | 455 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PEM.BB-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-bb-450) | 450 | 20.6 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PEM.WB-410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-410) | 410 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Guangdong province. It has grown rapidly into a multi-gigawatt producer - research sources cite roughly 20 GW of annual module capacity in early 2025, expanding further through the year. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status starting in Q3 2024, placing it among the top 2% of global solar manufacturers by bankability. Bruk-Bet Solar, by contrast, is a Polish manufacturer that launched its photovoltaic module factory in Tarnow in 2011 as a division of the broader BRUK-BET construction group, which has operated in Poland for over three decades. Bruk-Bet is the largest domestic module maker in Poland, but its production scale sits in the sub-gigawatt range - a 2017 expansion raised capacity to 120 MW annually, with no confirmed large-scale capacity announcements since. It does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists. AIKO holds the considerably stronger institutional and global footprint.

AIKO's product portfolio is built entirely around its proprietary N-type ABC (All Back Contact) cell architecture, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading losses. The residential Neostar series reaches up to 24.3% module efficiency, the Comet line targets commercial and industrial rooftops, and the large-format bifacial Stellar series is designed for utility-scale and floating solar projects. Bruk-Bet's catalog consists of its BEM series of half-cut monocrystalline modules - panels such as the BEM-385 and BEM-380 are aimed at residential and small commercial rooftops in the Polish and broader Central European market, with efficiencies in the 19-20% range per available spec sheets. Bruk-Bet also offers building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) modules, a niche that distinguishes it from pure-play panel manufacturers.

For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default choice if access to globally bankable, high-efficiency modules is the priority - its ABC technology, Tier 1 status, and scale give it clear advantages in performance and project financing eligibility. Bruk-Bet is a credible regional option for buyers in Poland or Central Europe who value locally manufactured product, shorter supply chains, or BIPV integration, but it is not a like-for-like competitor in global terms.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/ \| AIKO launches new rooftop solar panels with 24.3% efficiency \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-solar-n-type-abc-module/ \| Aiko Solar adds two products to n-type ABC module series \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/aiko-solar-abc-module-power-efficiency \| AIKO's ABC Module - Making the Most of Each Electron \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/06/06/polish-module-maker-bruk-bet-solar-raises-annual-capacity-to-120-mw/ \| Polish module maker Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/bruk-bet \| Bruk-Bet Sp. z o.o. - Solar Panels - Poland \| article

Sources:

\- \[AIKO launches new rooftop solar panels with 24.3% efficiency\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/)

\- \[Aiko Solar adds two products to n-type ABC module series\](https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-solar-n-type-abc-module/)

\- \[AIKO's ABC Module - Making the Most of Each Electron\](https://taiyangnews.info/technology/aiko-solar-abc-module-power-efficiency)

\- \[Polish module maker Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/06/06/polish-module-maker-bruk-bet-solar-raises-annual-capacity-to-120-mw/)

\- \[Bruk-Bet Sp. z o.o. - Solar Panels - Poland\](https://www.enfsolar.com/bruk-bet)

\- \[AIKO Achieves Prestigious Tier 1 Status by BloombergNEF\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/)

\- \[Tier 1 List of Solar Panel Manufacturers Q2 2026\](https://www.vicoexport.com/en/67499/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q2-2026/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Bruk-Bet](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-bruk-bet)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Bruk-Bet](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-bruk-bet)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Bruk-Bet](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-bruk-bet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-bruk-bet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.