---
title: "AEET vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-znshine"
---

# AEET vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 5 models). ZNShine leads on peak efficiency at 22.83%. ZNShine leans bifacial (42% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Suqian |
| Founded |  | 1988 |
| Employees |  | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity |  | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website |  | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 212 | +207 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 670 W | +470 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 535 W | +345 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 22.83% | +7.13 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 21.35% | +6.45 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.329%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 89 (42%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +3.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AEET | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 47 (22.2%) |


## Power distribution

ZNShine offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 43 (20.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | AEET | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 78 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based company that positions itself primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale distributor, offering branded solar modules alongside products from other suppliers. Limited public information is available about its founding date or aggregate manufacturing capacity, and no independent BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing was found for the brand in recent searches. ZNShine Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Jintan, Jiangsu Province, founded in 1988 and active in photovoltaics since 2006. ZNShine has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status continuously since 2013 - a mark confirming that major lenders are willing to finance projects using its modules - and carries a reported global production capacity in the multi-gigawatt range. On institutional footprint alone, ZNShine is the more established of the two.

ZNShine's current lineup centers on N-type TOPCon bifacial modules spanning residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with module efficiencies independently confirmed at up to roughly 22.5 to 22.65 percent. Its ZXM7-series panels are backed by a 12-year product warranty and a 30-year linear performance guarantee on double-glass variants. AEET Energy Group's branded catalog, based on available public data, includes older monocrystalline panel models, and no confirmed information was found indicating a full transition to TOPCon or comparable next-generation cell architectures. The company appears best suited to buyers seeking distribution-level sourcing within European markets rather than a direct manufacturer relationship.

For a typical buyer in 2025, ZNShine is the stronger default choice. Its documented BNEF Tier 1 standing, over a decade of bankability recognition, and a confirmed TOPCon bifacial product range give it a clear edge in both project-finance suitability and technology currency. AEET Energy Group may offer regional wholesale convenience, but without a comparable manufacturing pedigree or independent bankability certification, it carries meaningfully more uncertainty for lender-backed installations.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/znshine-solar-panels-review \| Complete Review of ZNShine Solar Panels - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/25418/znshine-solar/ \| ZNShine Solar Profile and Reviews - EnergySage \| review

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH Solar Panels - ENF Solar Directory \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-znshine)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.