---
title: "AEET vs WINAICO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs WINAICO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-winaico"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/aeet/winaico.png"
---

# AEET vs WINAICO

WINAICO has the broader catalog (44 vs 5 models). WINAICO leads on peak efficiency at 25.00%. WINAICO leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | WINAICO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | Taiwan |
| Headquarters |  | Hsinchu |
| Founded |  | 2003 |
| Employees |  | 100-500 |
| Annual capacity |  | 0.1-1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://winaico.com](https://winaico.com) |

WINAICO is a Taiwanese manufacturer of high-performance crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules, operating as an independent subsidiary of Win Win Precision Technology. The company focuses on premium-quality solar panels backed by long warranty periods and has built a strong reputation in markets such as Germany...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | WINAICO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 44 | +39 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 675 W | +475 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 491 W | +301 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | WINAICO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 25.00% | +9.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.99% | +8.09 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | WINAICO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.284%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 34 (77%) | +77 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.9 yrs | +3.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

WINAICO skews to higher efficiency: 59% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | WINAICO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 0 | 4 (9.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 7 (15.9%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 7 (15.9%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 26 (59.1%) |


## Power distribution

WINAICO offers more 600W+ panels (11% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | WINAICO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 27 (61.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 12 (27.3%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 5 (11.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (100%)

Dominant cell tech: Back Contact (41%)


| Technology | AEET | WINAICO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 18 (40.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 10 (22.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 8 (18.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 4 (9.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 4 (9.1%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, WINAICO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [WST-675BKX72-A2](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-675bkx72-a2) | 675 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [WST-670BKX72-A2](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-670bkx72-a2) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [WST-665BKX72-A2](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-665bkx72-a2) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [WST-630NHX66-A4](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-630nhx66-a4) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [WST-625NHX66-A4](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-625nhx66-a4) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [WST-585NGX72-A7](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-585ngx72-a7) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [WST-540NGX-D3](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-540ngx-d3) | 540 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [WST-530NGX-D3](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-530ngx-d3) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [WST-525NCX54-AW](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-525ncx54-aw) | 525 | 23.6 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [WST-520NCX54-AW](https://comparepv.com/panel/winaico-wst-520ncx54-aw) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I now have enough confirmed data to write a qualitative comparison, with AEET's profile necessarily more hedged given sparse independent coverage.

AEET is a German company, AEET Energy Group GmbH, based in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, that operates both as a photovoltaic distributor and as a brand offering its own labeled modules. Independent sourcing on AEET is thin: aggregator sites describe it as a wholesale distributor that resells modules from established manufacturers such as Hanwha Q Cells, Canadian Solar, Panasonic, and First Solar alongside AEET-branded panels, and at least one comparison site notes that AEET does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module list. WINAICO, by contrast, is a Taiwanese manufacturer headquartered in Hsinchu that has been producing panels since 2008, with its own fabrication plant rather than a purely distribution-based model. WINAICO has been publicly confirmed by Bloomberg New Energy Finance as a Tier 1 crystalline PV module manufacturer in company press releases covered by pv-magazine, though one independent installer review states the opposite, so the current status should be checked against BNEF's latest list directly. WINAICO's production scale appears modest, with secondary estimates in the 180 to 200 MW per year range from a single Taiwan facility, rather than the multi-gigawatt output of top-tier Chinese producers. On institutional footprint, WINAICO has the clearer and more independently documented manufacturing identity, while AEET's position is closer to that of a module reseller and system integrator operating under its own brand.

In terms of product focus, AEET's catalog spans a wide wattage range from older smaller-format panels to current higher-output modules, positioned for European residential and commercial rooftops, with TÜV Rheinland certification and warranty terms cited around 25 years performance and 10 years product coverage on some models. WINAICO concentrates on premium residential and commercial rooftop installations, with its current lineup built on n-type TOPCon bifacial glass-glass modules reaching roughly 21.8 to 22.3 percent efficiency and a notably long 30-year power warranty with an 87.4 percent retention guarantee at year 30, backed by pv-magazine coverage of its 2024 TOPCon launches.

For a typical buyer in 2025, WINAICO is the better-documented and more verifiably bankable choice, given its traceable Tier 1 claim, confirmed manufacturing base, and modern TOPCon technology with a strong warranty. AEET may suit buyers already working with a European distributor who values flexibility across multiple underlying module brands, but its bankability and manufacturing identity are less independently verified, so direct confirmation with the company and a current BNEF Tier 1 check are advisable before treating it as equivalent to an established manufacturer like WINAICO.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/bloomberg-rates-winaico-a-tier-1-module-maker\_100020698/ \| Bloomberg rates WINAICO a Tier 1 module maker \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/10/winaico-presents-bifacial-435-w-topcon-solar-modules-with-22-30-efficiency/ \| Winaico presents bifacial 435W TOPCon module, 22.30% efficiency \| article

\- https://gienergy.com.au/are-winaico-solar-panels-any-good/ \| Winaico Solar Panels Review (GI Energy, Australia) \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-felicityess \| AEET vs FelicityESS brand comparison \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs WINAICO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-winaico)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs WINAICO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-winaico)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs WINAICO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-winaico)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-winaico

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.