---
title: "AEET vs VDS Renewable - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs VDS Renewable solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-vds-renewable"
---

# AEET vs VDS Renewable

VDS Renewable has the broader catalog (63 vs 5 models). VDS Renewable leads on peak efficiency at 21.60%. VDS Renewable leans bifacial (16% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | VDS Renewable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  |  |
| Headquarters |  |  |
| Founded |  |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  |  |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | VDS Renewable | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 63 | +58 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 670 W | +470 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 441 W | +251 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | VDS Renewable | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 21.60% | +5.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 20.34% | +5.44 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | VDS Renewable | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.340%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 10 (16%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 25.4 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AEET | VDS Renewable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 17 (27.0%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 34 (54.0%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 12 (19.0%) |


## Power distribution

VDS Renewable offers more 600W+ panels (8% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | VDS Renewable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 22 (34.9%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 26 (41.3%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 10 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 5 (7.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%)


| Technology | AEET | VDS Renewable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 20 (31.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 43 (68.3%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, VDS Renewable


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [VDS-S132/M12H-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s132-m12h-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [VDS-S132/M12H-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s132-m12h-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [VDS-S132/M12H-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s132-m12h-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [VDS-S132/M12H-655](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s132-m12h-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [VDS-S132/M12H-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s132-m12h-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [VDS-S110/M12H-555](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s110-m12h-555) | 555 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [VDS-S110/M12H-550](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s110-m12h-550) | 550 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [VDS-S144/M10H-550](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s144-m10h-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [VDS-S110/M12H-545](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s110-m12h-545) | 545 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [VDS-S144/M10H-545](https://comparepv.com/panel/vds-renewable-vds-s144-m10h-545) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET Energy Group GmbH is a small German photovoltaic wholesale and installation company headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, operating primarily as a distributor rather than a volume manufacturer - its catalog of just five panel models reflects that niche, installer-facing role. Jiangsu VDS Renewable Technology Co., Ltd., based in Changzhou, China, is a dedicated module producer with a reported solar cell production capacity of 5 GW and module assembly capacity of 2 GW. Neither company appears on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list as of 2025, meaning both lack the institutional bankability required for most project-finance deals, but VDS Renewable's industrial scale and broader market presence give it a considerably stronger footprint.

The two portfolios sit in starkly different performance tiers. AEET's five models average 190 Wp and 14.9% efficiency, with a ceiling of 200 Wp and 15.7% - figures that correspond to legacy mono- or polycrystalline technology well below today's commercial norms, with no bifacial panels anywhere in the range. That profile is realistically limited to small retrofits or budget-constrained off-grid installations where headline efficiency is a secondary concern. VDS Renewable's 63-model lineup averages 441 Wp and 20.3% efficiency, peaking at 670 Wp and 21.6%, with roughly 16% of panels being bifacial and an average temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C. That combination of high output and power density fits mid-to-large commercial rooftops and utility-scale ground mounts where wattage per square metre is a core procurement criterion.

For nearly any buyer evaluating panels in 2025, VDS Renewable is the more capable default. Its higher wattage, superior efficiency, broader technology coverage across PERC, TOPCon, and HJT formats, and larger certified portfolio represent a competitive mid-market offering. AEET's lineup is unlikely to suit new-build projects given its outdated specifications, though it may still serve replacement work or small residential jobs in European markets where its distribution network provides logistical convenience. Both brands sit outside the Tier 1 bankable universe, so financed utility-scale projects would require additional lender due diligence on either manufacturer regardless of panel performance.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/vds-renewable \| Jiangsu VDS Renewable Technology - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-tier-1-vs-tier-2-solar-panels \| Tier 1 vs Tier 2 solar panels - SolarReviews guide \| article

\- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings \| Tier 1 solar panels list 2025 - updated manufacturers and rankings \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs VDS Renewable](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vds-renewable)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs VDS Renewable](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-vds-renewable)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs VDS Renewable](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-vds-renewable)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-vds-renewable

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.