---
title: "AEET vs Ulica Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs Ulica Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ulica-solar"
---

# AEET vs Ulica Solar

Ulica Solar has the broader catalog (76 vs 5 models). Ulica Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.88%. Ulica Solar leans bifacial (58% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Jiaxing |
| Founded |  | 2014 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.ulicasolar.com](https://www.ulicasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 76 | +71 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 715 W | +515 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 564 W | +374 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.88% | +8.18 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.26% | +7.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.303%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 44 (58%) | +58 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.3 yrs | +4.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Ulica Solar skews to higher efficiency: 14% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 0 | 4 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 16 (21.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 45 (59.2%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 11 (14.5%) |


## Power distribution

Ulica Solar offers more 600W+ panels (43% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (1.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 22 (28.9%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 20 (26.3%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 29 (38.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 4 (5.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AEET | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 72 (94.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 4 (5.3%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Ulica Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [UL-715M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [UL-710M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-710m-132dgn) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [UL-705M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-705m-132dgn) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [UL-700M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-700m-132dgn) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [UL-670M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [UL-670M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132hv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [UL-665M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [UL-665M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [UL-660M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [UL-660M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132hv) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET, formally AEET Energy Group GmbH, is headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, and operates primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale distributor and installer partner rather than as a manufacturer of its own solar cells. It sources modules from established production partners and positions itself around fast delivery, warehousing, and technical support for European installers, so it does not carry an independent BloombergNEF Tier 1 or production-capacity rating in its own right, since that classification applies to the underlying module manufacturers it distributes for. Ulica Solar, formally Ningbo Ulica Solar Co., Ltd., was founded in 2005 in Ningbo, China, backed by Shanshan Co., a major Chinese industrial group, and is a vertically integrated manufacturer producing its own wafers, cells and modules, exporting to more than 100 countries. Ulica has been confirmed on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list as of early 2025, giving it a stronger and more independently verifiable institutional footprint than AEET, whose bankability is inherited from whichever upstream manufacturer supplies a given order.

Because AEET is a distributor, its "product family" is effectively whatever Tier 1 modules it currently stocks for European residential and commercial rooftop installers, making its offering flexible but dependent on third-party sourcing rather than a fixed in-house technology roadmap. Ulica Solar's own catalog centers on N-type TOPCon mono and bifacial modules, spanning residential rooftop panels through higher-wattage commercial and utility-scale products, alongside older PERC-based lines, and the company holds multiple patents tied to its TOPCon cell work along with standard IEC, UL and ISO certifications.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice is less "manufacturer versus manufacturer" than "distributor versus manufacturer": Ulica Solar offers direct traceability to a certified Tier 1 producer with its own TOPCon technology, which suits buyers who want a single accountable manufacturer, while AEET can be a reasonable option in the European market for installers who value logistics and access to a curated mix of brands but should verify the specific underlying module manufacturer and its own bankability before relying on AEET's status alone.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile - distributor, Germany \| article

\- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/solarmodule.php \| AEET Energy Group solar modules wholesale page \| article

\- https://ulicasolar.com/en/index/news\_m/information\_id/130.html \| Ulica Solar named to new Tier 1 list of global PV module makers \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/ulica-solar \| Ningbo Ulica Solar Co., Ltd. company and product profile \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/ulica-solar \| Ulica Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ulica-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ulica-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.