--- title: "AEET vs SunKean - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs SunKean solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-sunkean" --- # AEET vs SunKean SunKean has the broader catalog (57 vs 5 models). SunKean leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. SunKean leans bifacial (77% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | SunKean | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | China | | Headquarters | | Wuxi, Jiangsu | | Founded | | 2013 | | Employees | | 200+ | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.sunkean.com](https://www.sunkean.com) | SUNKEAN specializes in providing sustainable energy connection solutions to global customers. They offer a range of products including solar cables, wire harnesses, and related connectors for photovoltaic, energy storage, and charging sectors. As of 2025, SUNKEAN employs over 200 people and operates a production... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | SunKean | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 57 | +52 | | Max Power | 200 W | 700 W | +500 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 447 W | +257 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | SunKean | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.52% | +7.82 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 21.25% | +6.35 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | SunKean | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 44 (77%) | +77 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.9 yrs | +3.9 yr | ## Efficiency distribution SunKean skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AEET | SunKean | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 9 (15.8%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 7 (12.3%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 16 (28.1%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 20 (35.1%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 5 (8.8%) | ## Power distribution SunKean offers more 600W+ panels (9% of lineup) | Power band | AEET | SunKean | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 11 (19.3%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 35 (61.4%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 6 (10.5%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 4 (7.0%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 1 (1.8%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%) | Technology | AEET | SunKean | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 13 (22.8%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 22 (38.6%) | | HJT | 0 | 14 (24.6%) | | N-type | 0 | 8 (14.0%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, SunKean | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKT700M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt700m12-132d5) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKT695M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt695m12-132d5) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKT690M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt690m12-132d5) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SKT685M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt685m12-132d5) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SKT680M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt680m12-132d5) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SKT555M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt555m10) | 555 | 21.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SKT550M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt550m10) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SKT545M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt545m10) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SKT540M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt540m10) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SKT535M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt535m10) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary SunKean is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2013, with a declared headcount of 200 or more employees, operating primarily as a cable and connector specialist that also produces a broad range of solar modules; no publicly confirmed Tier 1 bankability status or stock exchange listing has been identified for the brand. AEET Energy Group GmbH is registered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, and offers only five panel models in its catalog; it is explicitly not Tier 1 bankable and has a minimal institutional footprint by any measure. Between the two, SunKean carries a meaningfully larger commercial presence, though neither brand occupies the same tier as well-capitalized Chinese module giants such as JinkoSolar, LONGi, or Trina Solar. The two portfolios are strikingly different in character. SunKean's 57-model lineup is built around TOPCon cell technology (roughly 39% of models), delivers an average output of 447 Wp and a peak of 700 Wp, and achieves average panel efficiency of 21.2% with a top figure of 23.5%. Approximately 77% of its panels are bifacial, and the average warranty runs close to 29 years - a package clearly aimed at utility-scale ground mounts, large commercial rooftops, and premium residential installations that demand high energy density. AEET's five panels, by contrast, average just 190 Wp with a ceiling of 200 Wp and deliver efficiencies between 14.9% and 15.7%; they carry no bifacial offering, a 25-year warranty, and rely on an unspecified cell technology. That profile fits niche, low-power applications such as off-grid cabins, marine or RV systems, and small backup installations. For any buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025, they are not interchangeable. SunKean's specifications are competitive with mid-tier volume producers, and its broad bifacial TOPCon portfolio makes it a plausible option where project financiers do not require a named Tier 1 brand. AEET's limited, lower-efficiency lineup serves a different purpose entirely; it should only be considered when compact panel size or European provenance is a hard constraint rather than a preference. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/sunkean \| Sunkean - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| review \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-tier-1-vs-tier-2-solar-panels \| Tier 1 vs Tier 2 Solar Panels - SolarReviews explainer \| article Sources: \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[Sunkean - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/sunkean) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[Tier 1 vs. Tier 2 Solar Panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-tier-1-vs-tier-2-solar-panels) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunkean) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sunkean) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sunkean) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-sunkean Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.