---
title: "AEET vs Solarever - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs Solarever solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-solarever"
---

# AEET vs Solarever

Solarever has the broader catalog (12 vs 5 models). Solarever leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. Solarever leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | Mexico |
| Headquarters |  | Colima |
| Founded |  | 2012 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  | 1-2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.solarever.com.mx](https://www.solarever.com.mx) |

Solarever is a Mexican solar panel manufacturer, recognized as the number one national solar brand in Mexico, with a main production facility in the state of Colima. The company produces monocrystalline half-cut mono PERC solar panels and expanded into the US market in 2015-2016 through Solarever USA, with offices in...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 12 | +7 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 630 W | +430 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 550 W | +360 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.52% | +7.82 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.88% | +7.97 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.294%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 12 (100%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarever skews to higher efficiency: 42% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 0 | 7 (58.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 5 (41.7%) |


## Power distribution

Solarever offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 5 (41.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 7 (58.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | AEET | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 12 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarever


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) | 620 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE-182\*105-615M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-615m-132-bd) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE-182\*105-610M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-610m-132-bd) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE-182\*105-605M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-605m-132-bd) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE-182\*105-600M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-600m-132-bd) | 600 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) | 470 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Solarever is a China-founded, Mexico-headquartered manufacturer established in 2012, with US administrative offices in Lake Forest, California, and its main production base in Tecoman, Colima, running an LONGi partnership and roughly 1.1 GW of annual output. It is not yet a BloombergNEF Tier 1 listed brand, though EnergySage notes the company is actively pursuing that classification to qualify for institutionally financed projects. AEET, by contrast, is a German wholesale distributor, AEET Energy Group GmbH, based in Bad Gandersheim, that sources modules from multiple upstream Asian manufacturers rather than running its own fabs, spanning monocrystalline, polycrystalline and even thin-film formats. AEET likewise lacks confirmed Tier 1 bankability, positioning it more as a flexible European sourcing partner than a vertically integrated producer. Of the two, Solarever has the stronger institutional footprint, since it controls its own manufacturing capacity and has a documented, growing GW-scale output, whereas AEET's scale depends entirely on whichever OEM partners it is sourcing from at a given time.

In terms of product focus, Solarever concentrates on residential rooftop modules, typically 400-410 W monocrystalline panels with roughly 20.5-21 percent efficiency, an all-black aesthetic, and a 25-year product and performance warranty guaranteeing about 85 percent output retention, aimed squarely at the North American and Latin American residential and light commercial market. AEET's catalog is broader but less standardized, since as a distributor it can supply whatever cell technology (mono PERC, poly, or thin-film) its current partner mix offers, making it better suited to smaller installers and wholesalers in Europe who prioritize flexible sourcing and price over a single consistent product line rather than large financed utility projects.

For a typical 2025 buyer, Solarever is the more straightforward default: it is a real manufacturer with its own factory, a defined warranty structure, and a clear efficiency and wattage profile suited to rooftop solar, and it is on a visible path toward Tier 1 recognition. AEET can still be a reasonable choice for European buyers who value a flexible wholesale relationship and do not require bank-financed bankability guarantees, but the two brands are not interchangeable, since one is a panel producer and the other is primarily a sourcing intermediary.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/25194/solarever-usa/ \| Solarever USA supplier profile and panel specs \| review

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/solarever-solar-panels-review-hola-from-mexico.html \| Solarever solar panels review \| review

\- https://mexicobusiness.news/energy/news/solarever-longi-partnership-boosts-solar-innovation-mexico \| Solarever, LONGi partnership boosts solar innovation in Mexico \| article

\- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/solarmodule.php \| AEET Energy Group solar modules wholesale offering \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-felicityess \| AEET vs FelicityESS brand comparison \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarever)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-solarever)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarever)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-solarever

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

