--- title: "AEET vs S-Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs S-Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-s-energy" --- # AEET vs S-Energy S-Energy has the broader catalog (91 vs 5 models). S-Energy leads on peak efficiency at 22.38%. S-Energy leans bifacial (77% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | S-Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | South Korea | | Headquarters | | Seoul | | Founded | | 2011 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.s-energy.com](https://www.s-energy.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | S-Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 91 | +86 | | Max Power | 200 W | 665 W | +465 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 512 W | +322 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | S-Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 22.38% | +6.68 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 21.00% | +6.10 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | S-Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.339%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 70 (77%) | +77 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.7 yrs | +2.7 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AEET | S-Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 0 | 50 (54.9%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 34 (37.4%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 7 (7.7%) | ## Power distribution S-Energy offers more 600W+ panels (12% of lineup) | Power band | AEET | S-Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 4 (4.4%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 36 (39.6%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 40 (44.0%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 11 (12.1%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (59%) | Technology | AEET | S-Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 54 (59.3%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 25 (27.5%) | | Unknown | 0 | 12 (13.2%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, S-Energy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SL85-66BDL-665R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-665r) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SL85-66BDL-660R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-660r) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SL85-66BDL-655R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-655r) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SL85-66BDL-650R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-650r) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SL85-66BDL-645R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl85-66bdl-645r) | 645 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SL65-78TDP-625R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-625r) | 625 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SL65-78TDP-620R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-620r) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SL65-78TDP-615R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-615r) | 615 | 22.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SL65-78TDP-610R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-610r) | 610 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SL65-78TDP-605R](https://comparepv.com/panel/s-energy-sl65-78tdp-605r) | 605 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German-based photovoltaic wholesale partner headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany. Rather than operating as a vertically integrated panel manufacturer, AEET functions primarily as a distributor and system integrator, sourcing modules from world-leading producers and reselling them under its own brand while also providing planning, installation, and maintenance services through a network of more than 500 certified specialist partners across Germany. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation has been confirmed for AEET in publicly available sources. S-Energy, by contrast, is a South Korean manufacturer founded in 2001 as a spin-off from Samsung Electronics, with its main production facility in Daejeon, South Korea and sales offices in the United States, Chile, and Japan. S-Energy holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and operates a dedicated manufacturing base with an annual production capacity in the range of several hundred megawatts, giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint with project financiers and EPC contractors. S-Energy's best-known product family for the residential and light-commercial segment is the SN60 line, which uses half-cut monocrystalline silicon cells to reduce resistive losses and limit hot-spot risk. The line targets cost-conscious homeowners and small commercial rooftops, and independent reviewers note that S-Energy panels typically sell for noticeably less per watt than premium brands such as Maxeon or REC Solar, making them a recurring recommendation in value-focused comparisons. AEET's panel catalog, as listed on industry directories, skews toward older, lower-wattage crystalline silicon modules that appear better suited to legacy system replacements or price-driven projects in the European market; the company does not prominently publicize a current high-efficiency or bifacial product line in accessible public sources. For a typical buyer in 2025 who needs a bankable, reasonably priced monocrystalline module with confirmed manufacturer credentials and an accessible warranty chain, S-Energy is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 status eases project financing, its Samsung lineage provides supply-chain credibility, and its value pricing makes it competitive even against larger Chinese producers. AEET's value lies more in its German distribution and service network than in panel technology or manufacturing scale, so it may be the right partner for European installers seeking local support rather than for buyers comparing module specifications directly. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar directory \| article \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/s-energy-solar-panels-review \| S-Energy Solar Panels Review - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/s-energy/ \| S-Energy Solar Panels - EnergySage \| review \- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/s-energy-solar-panels-review-samsungs-little-sister.html \| S-Energy solar panels review 2026 - A1 SolarStore \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs S-Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-s-energy) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs S-Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-s-energy) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs S-Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-s-energy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-s-energy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.