--- title: "AEET vs RMCIP - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs RMCIP solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-rmcip" --- # AEET vs RMCIP AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 1 models). AEET leads on peak efficiency at 15.70%. ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | Russia | | Headquarters | | Ryazan | | Founded | | 1963 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | \<0.1 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | [http://rmcip.com](http://rmcip.com) | Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | RMCIP | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 1 | +4 | | Max Power | 200 W | 200 W | | | Avg Power | 190 W | 200 W | +10 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | RMCIP | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 12.40% | +3.30 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 12.40% | +2.50 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | RMCIP | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.400%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AEET | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (100.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | AEET | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (100.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | AEET | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 1 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, RMCIP | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [RZMP-200-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/rmcip-rzmp-200-t) | 200 | 12.4 | -0.400 | Polycrystalline | ## Summary RMCIP (Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC) is a Russian manufacturer based in Ryazan, established in 1963, making it one of the older industrial enterprises to have a solar division. Its photovoltaic output operates at a modest scale - publicly available data from the ENF Solar panel directory suggests production capacity in the low megawatt range historically, and the company does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists. AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German photovoltaic specialist headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, active since 2004, that functions both as a wholesale distributor and as a brand offering its own monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film module lines. Neither company features prominently in the GW-scale global rankings, though AEET's European market presence, broader portfolio, and two decades of wholesale experience give it a notably stronger institutional footprint. RMCIP's catalog - as documented in ENF Solar datasheets - focuses on smaller-wattage crystalline modules roughly in the 75 W to 275 W range, making the product line best suited to off-grid and small stand-alone PV systems rather than large commercial or utility-scale projects. AEET Energy Group targets a wider market, offering residential rooftop, commercial, and system-integrator customers across Europe with its own mono and polycrystalline panels as well as thin-film options; as a wholesale partner, it also supplies modules from other manufacturers, giving buyers single-supplier convenience. For a typical buyer in 2025, AEET Energy Group is the more practical default of the two. Its European base eases logistics, warranty claims, and financing conversations, while its product breadth accommodates a wider range of project sizes. RMCIP's limited documented capacity and absence from major bankability lists create friction for any installation requiring project finance. Buyers with demanding performance benchmarks or institutional requirements may still wish to evaluate well-documented Tier 1 alternatives alongside both brands. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/rmcip \| RMCIP - Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant profile \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/3695 \| RMCIP RZMP-220-T panel datasheet on ENF Solar \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile on ENF Solar \| article \- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/solarmodule.php \| AEET Energy Group - solar modules product page \| article Sources: \- \[RMCIP profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/rmcip) \- \[RMCIP RZMP-220-T datasheet - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/3695) \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[AEET Energy Group solar modules page\](https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/solarmodule.php) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-rmcip) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-rmcip) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-rmcip) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-rmcip Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.