---
title: "AEET vs Recom - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs Recom solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-recom"
---

# AEET vs Recom

Recom has the broader catalog (61 vs 5 models). Recom leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. Recom leans bifacial (38% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | Italy |
| Headquarters |  | Bolzano |
| Founded |  | 2007 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 61 | +56 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 730 W | +530 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 548 W | +358 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 24.30% | +8.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.68% | +7.78 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.284%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 23 (38%) | +38 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Recom skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 36 (59.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 20 (32.8%) |


## Power distribution

Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 34 (55.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 12 (19.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 10 (16.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%)


| Technology | AEET | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 51 (83.6%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Recom


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Recom Technologies is a European solar manufacturer founded in 2007, with module production based in Lannion, France, and cell manufacturing in Padua, Italy. It holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status - a designation it first achieved in Q4 2019 - and reports an annual production capacity exceeding 3.2 GW with sales in more than 110 countries. AEET Energy Group GmbH, by contrast, is headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, and operates primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale distributor and full-service partner rather than a vertically integrated module manufacturer. It maintains a network of over 500 certified specialist partners across Germany, but no BloombergNEF Tier 1 status has been confirmed for the brand in available sources. On institutional footprint, Recom is the meaningfully larger and better-recognized entity.

Recom's product catalog spans several distinct cell technologies - confirmed offerings include HJT modules under the Lion series, TOPCon n-type modules under the Lynx series, and back-contact and shingled variants - making it suitable for everything from premium residential rooftops to large utility-scale ground mounts. The flagship Lion 750W HJT module is positioned for high-yield utility projects, while the Lynx TOPCon range competes in the residential and commercial rooftop segment. AEET Energy Group's own-branded range covers monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film modules, though the company's primary value proposition is procurement access and on-the-ground installation support within Germany rather than proprietary module innovation.

For a buyer evaluating the two in 2025, Recom is the stronger default where bankability, third-party-verified technology diversity, and international supply chain depth matter - particularly for financed utility or large commercial projects. AEET serves a different need: an integrator or small installer in Germany who values consolidated wholesale sourcing and local service over manufacturer brand prestige. The two brands are not directly interchangeable; they occupy different positions in the value chain.

\---LINKS---

\- https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/ \| Recom Technologies achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status Q4 2019 \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/recom\_company\_profile.pdf \| Recom company profile - largest European solar manufacturer - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/recom/ \| Recom solar panels profile and buyer overview - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile - ENF Solar \| article

\- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/index.php \| AEET Energy Group GmbH official site - photovoltaic wholesale partner \| article

Sources:

\- \[Recom Bloomberg Tier 1\](https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/)

\- \[PV Magazine - Recom Company Profile\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/recom\_company\_profile.pdf)

\- \[EnergySage - Recom Solar Panels\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/recom/)

\- \[ENF Solar - AEET Energy Group\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet)

\- \[AEET Energy Group Official Site\](https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/index.php)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-recom)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-recom)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-recom)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-recom

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.