---
title: "AEET vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-q-cells"
---

# AEET vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 5 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website |  | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 89 | +84 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 675 W | +475 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 468 W | +278 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.20% | +7.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 21.21% | +6.31 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.325%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +2.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | AEET | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, operating as Hanwha Q CELLS, is the solar division of South Korea's Hanwha Group and stands among the most established names in global photovoltaics. Originally founded in Germany in 1999, the brand was acquired by Hanwha in 2012 and has since grown into a multi-gigawatt operation with manufacturing anchored in Dalton, Georgia, giving it the largest solar production footprint in the Western Hemisphere - reportedly reaching 8.4 GW of U.S.-based module capacity. Q-Cells holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status, which underscores the financial credibility of its parent conglomerate and its ability to honor long-term warranty obligations. AEET Energy Group GmbH, by contrast, is a German photovoltaic wholesale distributor and installer headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany. Based on available public information, AEET does not manufacture its own solar modules but instead sources and resells panels from third-party producers, which means it does not carry Tier 1 manufacturer status in the conventional BloombergNEF sense. Q-Cells has the decisively stronger institutional footprint as an original equipment manufacturer.

Q-Cells sells under its own branded product lines, most notably the Q.TRON and Q.PEAK series, which deploy the company's proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO cell architecture, achieving module efficiencies of up to roughly 22.5%. These products target residential rooftops, commercial installations, and increasingly utility-scale projects, backed by a stated 25-year product warranty and a strong independent installer network across North America and Europe. AEET, operating as a wholesaler, distributes modules from a range of manufacturers, so the technology mix - whether PERC, TOPCon, or HJT - depends on which brands appear in its current catalog rather than any proprietary cell development.

For a typical buyer in 2025 seeking bankable, warrantied hardware with traceable manufacturing and broad installer support, Q-Cells is the more straightforward choice. AEET may serve procurement-focused buyers or integrators looking for flexible sourcing across multiple brands, but the two entities are not directly comparable as competing manufacturers.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels - The Complete Review \| EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 \| SolarReviews \| review

\- https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/ \| Hanwha Qcells - record efficiency and $1.45B DOE loan \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar \| article

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review

Sources:

\- \[Q CELLS Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/)

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells record efficiency and DOE loan - Carbon Credits\](https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/)

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet)

\- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-q-cells)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.