--- title: "AEET vs Peimar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs Peimar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-peimar" --- # AEET vs Peimar Peimar leads on peak efficiency at 23.04%. Peimar leans bifacial (40% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | Italy | | Headquarters | | Torino | | Founded | | 2012 | | Employees | | 50 | | Annual capacity | | 0.3 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.peimar.com](https://www.peimar.com) | Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 5 | | | Max Power | 200 W | 595 W | +395 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 440 W | +250 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.04% | +7.34 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 20.23% | +5.33 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.346%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 2 (40%) | +40 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AEET | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 1 (20.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | AEET | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 1 (20.0%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (60%) | Technology | AEET | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 3 (60.0%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Peimar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [OR10H595MNDB](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h595mndb) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SA500M (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sa500m-fb) | 500 | 21.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [OR10H450MNDB (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h450mndb-fb) | 450 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SG330P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg330p) | 330 | 17.0 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [SG325P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg325p) | 325 | 16.7 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German-registered manufacturer headquartered in Königsbrunn, Bavaria, founded in 2003. The company runs production facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual output reported at approximately 2.5 GW. In 2024, BloombergNEF recognized AEET as Europe's sole Tier 1 PV manufacturer with high bankability - a designation that signals lenders' willingness to finance projects using its modules, a key criterion for commercial and utility developers. Peimar Group was founded in 2007 and is based in Brescia, Italy, with a fully automated production line in nearby Castegnato and an additional factory in Ningbo, China. Its production scale is considerably smaller - independent sources place the Ningbo plant at around 300 MW per year - and no publicly available BNEF Tier 1 confirmation was found for Peimar. On institutional footprint and financing credibility, AEET holds the stronger position. AEET's product catalog spans a wide power range and includes N-type TOPCon, P-type PERC, and heterojunction (HJT) variants, with PV Magazine awarding its TOPCon Meteor series a five-star rating in performance testing. Large-format bifacial modules in the 600-725 W class position AEET for utility-scale and commercial ground-mount work, while mid-size formats target residential rooftops. Peimar's lineup leans on its "Made in Italy" identity, offering mono PERC modules primarily suited to residential and light commercial rooftops. The brand also covers select bifacial and transparent glass products for niche applications such as building-integrated PV. A standout feature is Peimar's warranty depth - a 20-year product warranty and a 30-year linear power guarantee - which exceeds what most similarly sized manufacturers offer. For most buyers in 2025 - especially those working on projects requiring project finance or long-term bankability assurance - AEET is the clearer default, backed by Tier 1 status, a multi-GW production base, and a confirmed next-generation cell roadmap. Peimar is a credible choice for European residential installations where Italian manufacturing provenance and above-average warranty terms carry weight, but its limited scale and unconfirmed bankability status make it a secondary option for larger commercial work. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/10/12/ae-solar-unveils-n-type-topcon-solar-modules-with-22-2-efficiency/ \| AE Solar unveils n-type TOPCon modules with 22.2% efficiency - PV Magazine \| article \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal buyer's guide \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21270/peimar-group/ \| Peimar Group profile and installer reviews - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/peimar-group \| Peimar solar panels - SolarReviews \| review Sources: \- \[AE Solar unveils n-type TOPCon solar modules - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/10/12/ae-solar-unveils-n-type-topcon-solar-modules-with-22-2-efficiency/) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[Peimar Group - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21270/peimar-group/) \- \[Peimar solar panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/peimar-group) \- \[Peimar Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/peimar-solar-panels-review-guide/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-peimar) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-peimar) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-peimar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-peimar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.