--- title: "AEET vs LS Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs LS Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ls-solar" --- # AEET vs LS Solar AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 2 models). LS Solar leads on peak efficiency at 20.46%. ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | LS Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | | | Headquarters | | | | Founded | | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | LS Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 2 | +3 | | Max Power | 200 W | 400 W | +200 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 400 W | +210 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | LS Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 20.46% | +4.76 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 20.46% | +5.56 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | LS Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.370%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AEET | LS Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 0 | 1 (50.0%) | | Unknown | 0 | 1 (50.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | AEET | LS Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 0 | 2 (100.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | AEET | LS Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 2 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, LS Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [STC 01](https://comparepv.com/panel/ls-solar-stc-01) | 400 | 20.5 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [400 W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ls-solar-400-w) | 400 | - | -0.370 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary LS Solar, operating as LS Solar Pte. Ltd., is a Singapore-registered company focused primarily on solar module distribution, assembly, and systems integration rather than large-scale manufacturing. It is a small enterprise - publicly available business data places its revenue well below $5 million and its headcount under 25 - and it does not appear on any BloombergNEF or independent Tier 1 bankability lists. AEET Energy Group GmbH is headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, and has been active in the European photovoltaic market for a number of years, positioning itself as a photovoltaic wholesale partner with a network of more than 500 certified specialist partners across Germany. AEET also falls outside mainstream Tier 1 rankings, but its European base, reinsurance backing from Munich Re for performance guarantees, and established trade network give it a somewhat stronger institutional footprint than LS Solar in its home region. In terms of product scope, LS Solar acts largely as a one-stop integrator, bundling modules from various sources with inverters, charge controllers, batteries, and accessories, and targeting customers who need a complete off-grid or grid-tied system rather than just a module. AEET's catalog has historically centered on self-developed monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules in the 270W to 300W range, along with thin-film options, a product profile that reflects older cell-generation technology. Neither company publicly confirms adoption of current-generation TOPCon or HJT cells, so no such claim can be made here. For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand is a natural default choice when compared against established global module makers. AEET may suit buyers in Central Europe who need a locally supported wholesale supply chain with insurance-backed performance guarantees. LS Solar fits best for Southeast Asian buyers seeking a small integrator that handles full system supply and installation logistics. For large-scale or bankability-sensitive projects, both brands would be difficult to recommend over proven Tier 1 suppliers. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar company profile \| article \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal buyer's guide entry \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/ls-solar \| LS Solar Profit GmbH - ENF Solar company profile \| article \- https://www.zoominfo.com/c/aeet-energy-group-gmbh/371167879 \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ZoomInfo company overview \| article Sources: \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[LS Solar - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/ls-solar) \- \[LS Solar Pte. Ltd. - ZoomInfo\](https://www.zoominfo.com/c/ls-solar-pte-ltd/447682558) \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ZoomInfo\](https://www.zoominfo.com/c/aeet-energy-group-gmbh/371167879) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs LS Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ls-solar) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs LS Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ls-solar) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs LS Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ls-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ls-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.