---
title: "AEET vs Lina Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs Lina Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-lina-energy"
---

# AEET vs Lina Energy

Lina Energy has the broader catalog (37 vs 5 models). Lina Energy leads on peak efficiency at 22.37%. Lina Energy leans bifacial (19% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | United Kingdom |
| Headquarters |  | Lancaster |
| Founded |  | 2017 |
| Employees |  | 28 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.lina.energy/](https://www.lina.energy/) |

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 37 | +32 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 550 W | +350 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 402 W | +212 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 22.37% | +6.67 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 20.32% | +5.42 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.352%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 7 (19%) | +19 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +3.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AEET | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 12 (32.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 6 (16.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 12 (32.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 7 (18.9%) |


## Power distribution


| Power band | AEET | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 18 (48.6%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 15 (40.5%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 4 (10.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (30%)


| Technology | AEET | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (2.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 13 (35.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 11 (29.7%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 8 (21.6%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 4 (10.8%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Lina Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LEPV 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LEPV 550 (LEPV 144 HALF-CUT PLUS)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550-lepv-144-half-cut-plus) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LEPV 132 HC ICON PLUS 500Wp (BLACK - STANDARD - BICOLOUR)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-hc-icon-plus-500wp-black-standard-bicolour) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LEPV 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-500) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LEPV 480](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LEPV 475](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-475) | 475 | 21.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LEPV 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-460) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LEPV 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-450) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LEPV 132 ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK 440Wp (LEPV 440)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-ultra-premium-black-440wp-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LEPV 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based photovoltaic wholesale and solutions provider headquartered in Bad Gandersheim. The company has operated for many years, positioning itself primarily as a full-service PV partner - sourcing, planning, and installing systems for residential and commercial clients across Europe rather than operating as a volume panel manufacturer in the traditional sense. Its modules carry TÜV Rheinland certification, though no confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status was found in publicly available sources. Lina Energy Technology Ltd. is a comparatively younger company, founded around 2016 and headquartered in Bulgaria, with additional offices in Jordan and China. It markets itself as a global manufacturer targeting multiple regions, though it does not appear on major Tier 1 or BloombergNEF lists. On institutional footprint, AEET's longer European track record and established wholesale network give it a modest edge for buyers in the EU market.

AEET's catalog is oriented toward complete system packages, making it a natural fit for installers and small commercial buyers in German-speaking and wider European markets seeking a single-source procurement relationship. Lina Energy's published range spans monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules with outputs up to roughly 450 W, covering residential rooftops through light commercial ground mounts, though detailed cell-technology specifications - such as TOPCon or HJT adoption - were not confirmed by available independent sources. Both brands sit well outside the tier of high-volume Asian manufacturers that dominate utility-scale procurement globally.

For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand stands out as a default first choice against well-documented Tier 1 alternatives. AEET is more relevant to European installers who value a local wholesale relationship and full-service support, while Lina Energy may appeal to emerging-market buyers in Southeast Europe or the Middle East looking for competitively priced modules. Due diligence on local distribution, warranty enforcement, and project finance eligibility is especially important for both, given the limited third-party review coverage each brand currently has.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Technology Ltd. profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/lina-energy-solutions \| Lina Energy Solutions buyer guide - EnergyPal \| review

\- https://www.energy-xprt.com/companies/aeet-energy-group-gmbh-59350 \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile - Energy XPRT \| article

Sources:

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet)

\- \[Lina Energy Technology Ltd. - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy)

\- \[Lina Energy Solutions - EnergyPal\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/lina-energy-solutions)

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - Energy XPRT\](https://www.energy-xprt.com/companies/aeet-energy-group-gmbh-59350)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-lina-energy)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-lina-energy)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-lina-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-lina-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.