--- title: "AEET vs Leapton - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs Leapton solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-leapton" --- # AEET vs Leapton Leapton has the broader catalog (119 vs 5 models). Leapton leads on peak efficiency at 23.32%. Leapton leans bifacial (49% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | Leapton | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | Japan | | Headquarters | | Kobe | | Founded | | 2012 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | 3+ GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | | [http://www.leaptonpv.com/](http://www.leaptonpv.com/) | Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | Leapton | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 119 | +114 | | Max Power | 200 W | 720 W | +520 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 546 W | +356 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | Leapton | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.32% | +7.62 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.18% | +7.28 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | Leapton | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.307%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 58 (49%) | +49 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +4.5 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Leapton skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AEET | Leapton | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 0 | 5 (4.2%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 32 (26.9%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 74 (62.2%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 8 (6.7%) | ## Power distribution Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup) | Power band | AEET | Leapton | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 0 | 48 (40.3%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 33 (27.7%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 28 (23.5%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 10 (8.4%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%) | Technology | AEET | Leapton | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 0 | 105 (88.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 14 (11.8%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Leapton | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-715w) | 715 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NH-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nh-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LP210\*210-M-66-NB-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/leapton-lp210-210-m-66-nb-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based photovoltaic wholesaler and full-service partner that has been active in the European solar market for a number of years. Rather than operating its own large-scale cell or wafer production, AEET positions itself as a sourcing and distribution intermediary that works alongside established module manufacturers to supply residential and commercial installers - primarily in the German-speaking European market. No Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability listing has been found in publicly available sources, and no independent production capacity figure in gigawatts is confirmed. Leapton Energy, by contrast, is a Japanese-headquartered company with its manufacturing base in Changshu, China. It has held recurring BloombergNEF Tier 1 listings through Q4 2024 and has been named a Top Performer in the Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard, giving it a notably stronger institutional footprint. Product offerings reflect this structural difference. AEET's catalog, as found in third-party databases, includes monocrystalline and multicrystalline modules in a wattage range consistent with older PERC-era designs - suited to small residential rooftops and light commercial retrofits in markets where the company has distribution reach. Leapton's current lineup centers on N-type TOPCon bifacial modules with efficiencies confirmed up to roughly 22 percent and power classes reaching into the high hundreds of watts, making the brand competitive for both residential premium installs and mid-scale commercial ground mounts. Leapton is generally positioned as a value-oriented Tier 1 option, priced below better-known Chinese giants while still clearing reliability benchmarks in independent testing. For a buyer evaluating the two brands in 2025, Leapton is the more documentable choice: its reliability testing results, Tier 1 history, and independently verified product specifications offer a clearer due-diligence trail. AEET may suit buyers within its specific European distribution network who want a single-source partner for modules, inverters, and installation support, but the lack of publicly verifiable bankability data makes it harder to justify for project-financed or larger-scale deployments. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/leapton-solar-panels-review/ \| Leapton Solar Panels Review - Tier 1 Panels Made In China By Japanese Company \| review \- https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/leapton-solar/ \| Leapton Solar Named Top Performer in Kiwa PVEL 2025 Reliability Scorecard \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - Solar Panels - Germany \| article \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - Best Solar Panels for Homes 2025 - EnergyPal \| review \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/leapton-review.html \| Leapton Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-leapton) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-leapton) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Leapton](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-leapton) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-leapton Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.