---
title: "AEET vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-jolywood"
---

# AEET vs Jolywood

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 5 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Taizhou |
| Founded |  | 2008 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website |  | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 128 | +123 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 715 W | +515 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 554 W | +364 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.60% | +7.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.54% | +7.64 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.284%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 110 (86%) | +86 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 0 | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 38 (29.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 8 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AEET | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 122 (95.3%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (4.7%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET Energy Group GmbH and Jolywood represent opposite ends of the solar manufacturing spectrum. AEET is a small German-registered firm with no Tier 1 bankability rating and a portfolio of just five panel models, while Jolywood (Suzhou) Sunwatt Co., Ltd. is a China-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2008, publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE: 300393), and recognized as Tier 1 bankable, with module production capacity approaching 10 GW and cell production capacity reported near 20 GW. Jolywood was among the earliest commercial-scale adopters of n-type TOPCon technology and carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint - it is independently bankable, exchange-listed, and has a documented record of high-volume project supply.

The portfolio contrast is equally stark. AEET's five products average 190 Wp and peak at 200 Wp, with an average efficiency of 14.9% and a top efficiency of 15.7%; cell technology is unspecified and no bifacial panels are offered, suggesting a legacy or low-margin product line suited primarily to small budget installations and off-grid applications where output density is not a priority. The 25-year warranty is standard for the industry. Jolywood's 128-panel catalogue, by contrast, averages 553.6 Wp and reaches 715 Wp at the top end, with an average efficiency of 22.5% and a peak of 23.6% - both well above the current mainstream. Roughly 86% of Jolywood's lineup is bifacial and 95% uses TOPCon cells, making it a strong fit for utility-scale ground mounts, large commercial rooftops, and any project where land use or energy yield per installed watt matters. Jolywood's standard 30-year warranty exceeds AEET's by five years.

For the vast majority of buyers in 2025 - whether residential, commercial, or utility - Jolywood is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 bankability is essential for project financing, its bifacial TOPCon technology delivers meaningfully higher yield, and its deep 128-model catalogue provides flexibility across power classes. AEET's narrow, low-output lineup and unspecified cell technology leave it relevant only in cost-sensitive niche applications where legacy module specs are acceptable and institutional financing is not a factor.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/27/jolywood-releases-595-w-bifacial-topcon-solar-panel-for-harsh-environments/ \| Jolywood releases 595 W bifacial TOPCon panel for harsh environments \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/12/20/jolywood-switches-on-1-5-gw-topcon-solar-cell-factory-in-china/ \| Jolywood switches on 1.5 GW TOPCon solar cell factory in China \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile - ENF Solar directory \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/jolywood-review.html \| Jolywood solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-jolywood)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.