---
title: "AEET vs IBC Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AEET vs IBC Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ibc-solar"
---

# AEET vs IBC Solar

IBC Solar has the broader catalog (33 vs 5 models). IBC Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.18%. IBC Solar leans bifacial (45% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AEET | IBC Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | Germany |
| Headquarters |  | Bad Staffelstein |
| Founded |  | 1982 |
| Employees |  | 500 |
| Annual capacity |  | 11+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  | NEWCONNECT: IBC |
| Website |  | [https://www.ibc-solar.com](https://www.ibc-solar.com) |

IBC Solar is a leading full-service provider of energy solutions and services in the field of photovoltaics and storage. The company offers complete photovoltaic systems and covers the entire product range from planning to the turnkey handover of photovoltaic systems. As a manufacturer-independent company, IBC SOLAR...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AEET | IBC Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 33 | +28 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 720 W | +520 W |
| Avg Power | 190 W | 459 W | +269 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AEET | IBC Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 23.18% | +7.48 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.14% | +7.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AEET | IBC Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.309%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 15 (45%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

IBC Solar skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AEET | IBC Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (3.0%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (9.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 4 (12.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 23 (69.7%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (6.1%) |


## Power distribution

IBC Solar offers more 600W+ panels (9% of lineup)


| Power band | AEET | IBC Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 3 (9.1%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 24 (72.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 3 (9.1%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 3 (9.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | AEET | IBC Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 6 (18.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 13 (39.4%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 11 (33.3%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 3 (9.1%) |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, IBC Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YH720W-33MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-yh720w-33mhd-mh) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YH715W-33MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-yh715w-33mhd-mh) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YH710W-33MHD/MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-yh710w-33mhd-mh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YH550W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-yh550w-36mh) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [YH545W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-yh545w-36mh) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YH540W-36MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-yh540w-36mh) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [IBC Module White 455 MS-TA1](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-ibc-module-white-455-ms-ta1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-ibc-module-transparent-455-ls-ta2) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [IBC Module Black 455 LS-TA2](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-ibc-module-black-455-ls-ta2) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [White 455 MS-TA1](https://comparepv.com/panel/ibc-solar-white-455-ms-ta1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

IBC Solar is a German manufacturer founded in 1982 with over four decades of operational history and a declared production capacity exceeding 11 GW, making it one of Europe's more established solar brands. The company is publicly listed on NEWCONNECT, a Warsaw-based growth market, and employs approximately 500 people. AEET, by contrast, has no publicly verifiable headquarters, founding date, production capacity, or Tier 1 bankability rating, and returned no meaningful presence in independent industry databases - a signal of a very limited institutional footprint relative to IBC Solar's long track record.

The two portfolios differ sharply in technical character. IBC Solar's 33-panel lineup centers on TOPCon cell technology (roughly 39% of its range) and achieves an average module efficiency of 22.1%, peaking at 23.18% - competitive with the upper tier of the global market in 2025. Average output sits at 459 Wp with a maximum of 720 Wp, and about 45% of panels are bifacial, making the lineup well-suited to premium residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial systems where energy density matters. A 30-year product warranty reinforces that positioning. AEET's five-panel range tells a different story: average efficiency of just 14.9% (peak 15.7%), average output of 190 Wp (max 200 Wp), no bifacial products, and an unspecified cell technology. These figures are consistent with older polycrystalline or entry-level monocrystalline designs, and the 25-year warranty does not offset the performance gap.

For any buyer making a decision in 2025, IBC Solar is the clear default across virtually every application. The efficiency gap alone - roughly 7 percentage points - means AEET panels require substantially more roof area to deliver equivalent generation, and the absence of Tier 1 bankability introduces financing and resale risk. AEET might serve niche off-grid or ultra-budget installations where upfront cost is the sole criterion, but for grid-tied residential or commercial projects, IBC Solar's depth of portfolio and institutional standing are decisive advantages.

\---LINKS---

\- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-april-2025 \| Top Solar Modules Listing - April 2025 \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/the-pv-review-2025-a-year-of-performance-and-reliability-issues-for-topcon-and-n-type-solar-pv-modules/ \| PV Tech: TOPCon and n-type reliability issues review 2025 \| article

\- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/solar-panel-bankability-and-the-tier-1-list \| Solar Panel Bankability and the Tier 1 List - RENVU \| article

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List Q4 2025 - Vico Export \| article

Sources:

\- \[Top Solar Modules Listing - April 2025\](https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-april-2025)

\- \[PV Tech: TOPCon and n-type reliability issues review 2025\](https://www.pv-tech.org/the-pv-review-2025-a-year-of-performance-and-reliability-issues-for-topcon-and-n-type-solar-pv-modules/)

\- \[Solar Panel Bankability and the Tier 1 List - RENVU\](https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/solar-panel-bankability-and-the-tier-1-list)

\- \[Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List Q4 2025\](https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs IBC Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ibc-solar)
- [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs IBC Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ibc-solar)
- [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs IBC Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ibc-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ibc-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.