--- title: "AEET vs Hanersun - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs Hanersun solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-hanersun" --- # AEET vs Hanersun Hanersun has the broader catalog (254 vs 5 models). Hanersun leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Hanersun leans bifacial (54% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | China | | Headquarters | | Nanjing | | Founded | | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.hanersun.com](https://www.hanersun.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | Hanersun | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 254 | +249 | | Max Power | 200 W | 750 W | +550 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 540 W | +350 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | Hanersun | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 24.80% | +9.10 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 22.19% | +7.29 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | Hanersun | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 136 (54%) | +54 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +3.6 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Hanersun skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AEET | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 2 (0.8%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 32 (12.6%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 70 (27.6%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 94 (37.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 56 (22.0%) | ## Power distribution Hanersun offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup) | Power band | AEET | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 8 (3.1%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 108 (42.5%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 48 (18.9%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 76 (29.9%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 14 (5.5%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%) | Technology | AEET | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 57 (22.4%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 170 (66.9%) | | Back Contact | 0 | 18 (7.1%) | | N-type | 0 | 9 (3.5%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Hanersun | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HN21N-66HT750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HN21N-66HT745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HN21N-66HT740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HN21N-66HT735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HN21N-66HT730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HN21N-66HT725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht725w) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HN21N-66HT720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HN21N-66HT715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HN21N-66HT710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HN21N-66H705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66h705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Hanersun is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, China. The company secured a place on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list in 2023 and has since maintained that bankability status, giving it credibility with project financiers. By the end of 2025 the company reported having cumulatively shipped over 16 GW of modules globally, and it has been named a Top Performer in Kiwa PVEL's 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard - an independent durability benchmark that resonates with institutional buyers. AEET Energy Group GmbH is registered in Germany and describes itself primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale partner rather than a vertically integrated module maker, sourcing panels from third-party manufacturers. No Tier 1 or BNEF bankability designation has been found for AEET, and no comparable reliability scorecard recognition is on record. Hanersun therefore has the considerably stronger institutional footprint of the two. In terms of product technology, Hanersun's current catalog centers on n-type TOPCon cells and an advanced ABC (Alphabet Back Contact) series, the latter reaching efficiencies pv-magazine confirmed at up to 23.2% in late 2023. The range covers large-format modules well suited to utility-scale ground mounts and commercial rooftops, and the company exhibited next-generation solutions at Intersolar Europe 2025. AEET's documented product portfolio consists mainly of older crystalline silicon panels in the 185W-300W power class with efficiencies in the 14-16% range, which are characteristic of legacy PERC or standard multicrystalline designs. These specs position AEET's offering in the budget or retrofit segment rather than in performance-focused applications. For a typical buyer in 2025 - whether residential, commercial, or utility-scale - Hanersun is the more defensible default. It carries bankability credentials, independently verified reliability data, and a modern cell technology roadmap. AEET may suit a buyer seeking lower-cost legacy modules through a European distributor, but the absence of Tier 1 status and current performance benchmarks makes it difficult to recommend on equal terms. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/11/15/hanersun-launches-abc-solar-module-series-with-up-to-23-2-efficiency/ \| Hanersun launches ABC solar module series with up to 23.2% efficiency \| article \- https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/hanersun-energy/ \| Hanersun Energy - Kiwa PVEL 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard \| review \- https://canalsolar.com.br/en/hanersun-is-classified-as-tier-1-by-bnef/ \| Hanersun classified as Tier 1 by BNEF \| article \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/hanersun \| Hanersun Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar Panel Directory \| article Sources: \- \[Hanersun launches ABC solar module series - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/11/15/hanersun-launches-abc-solar-module-series-with-up-to-23-2-efficiency/) \- \[Hanersun - Kiwa PVEL 2025 Scorecard\](https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/hanersun-energy/) \- \[Hanersun classified as Tier 1 by BNEF\](https://canalsolar.com.br/en/hanersun-is-classified-as-tier-1-by-bnef/) \- \[Hanersun Solar Panels Review - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/hanersun) \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Hanersun](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hanersun) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs Hanersun](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-hanersun) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Hanersun](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-hanersun) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-hanersun Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.