--- title: "AEET vs Corab - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs Corab solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-corab" --- # AEET vs Corab Corab leads on peak efficiency at 21.00%. ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | Corab | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | Poland | | Headquarters | | Olsztyn | | Founded | | 1993 | | Employees | | 300+ | | Annual capacity | | 2.5 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.corab.pl](https://www.corab.pl) | Corab is a leading Polish manufacturer of steel photovoltaic structures and a distributor of devices from renowned brands in the renewable energy sector. They design and produce assembly structures for various types of roofs and surfaces and are also a distributor of photovoltaic modules, inverters, and energy storage... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | Corab | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 5 | | | Max Power | 200 W | 410 W | +210 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 397 W | +207 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | Corab | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | 21.00% | +5.30 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | 20.60% | +5.70 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | Corab | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.337%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AEET | Corab | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (20.0%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 3 (60.0%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 1 (20.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | AEET | Corab | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 1 (20.0%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 4 (80.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | AEET | Corab | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 5 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Corab | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [EC410M-10-108FB-V](https://comparepv.com/panel/corab-ec410m-10-108fb-v) | 410 | 21.0 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [EC405M-10-108B-V 405 Wp](https://comparepv.com/panel/corab-ec405m-10-108b-v-405-wp) | 405 | 20.9 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [EC405M-10-108B-V](https://comparepv.com/panel/corab-ec405m-10-108b-v) | 405 | 20.9 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [EC405M-10-108B](https://comparepv.com/panel/corab-ec405m-10-108b) | 405 | 20.9 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [ENCOR EC360M-6-120FB](https://comparepv.com/panel/corab-encor-ec360m-6-120fb) | 360 | 19.3 | -0.365 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Now I have enough to write the comparison. Corab is a Polish solar manufacturer founded in 1993 with over 300 employees and a stated production capacity of 2.5 GW, giving it a solid industrial base in Central Europe. AEET Energy Group GmbH, headquartered in Germany, operates primarily as a photovoltaic wholesaler and distributor rather than a vertically integrated manufacturer; the company carries no Tier 1 bankability designation and reports no proprietary production capacity of its own. For institutional buyers or project financiers, Corab's manufacturing scale and three-decade track record place it in a meaningfully stronger position. The two lineups occupy very different performance tiers. Corab's four-model portfolio averages 395 Wp and 20.5% efficiency, peaking at 410 Wp and 21.0% - figures consistent with modern monocrystalline cell technology and well suited to space-constrained residential or commercial rooftops where output per square metre matters. AEET's five panels average just 190 Wp and 14.9% efficiency, topping out at 200 Wp and 15.7%, numbers typical of older polycrystalline technology aimed at small off-grid or budget applications. Both brands carry a 25-year warranty and show no bifacial panels in the reviewed portfolios, but the wattage gap - roughly 2:1 in Corab's favour - makes direct substitution impractical for any standard grid-tied installation. For a typical buyer in 2025 planning a residential or small commercial project, Corab is the clearer default. Higher wattage and efficiency translate to fewer panels for the same system output, and a 2.5 GW manufacturing base supports supply continuity in a way that a distributor-led brand cannot guarantee. AEET's low-power panels may serve a specific niche - small off-grid cabins, marine applications, or legacy retrofit work where 190-200 Wp modules are an exact-fit requirement - but for mainstream grid-connected solar the two are not meaningfully interchangeable. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar industry directory profile \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/corab \| Corab S.A. - ENF Solar industry directory profile \| review \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group buyer's guide - EnergyPal \| review \- https://www.pv-tech.org/top-50-most-bankable-module-suppliers-in-the-pv-industry-today/ \| PV Tech - Top 50 most bankable module suppliers \| article Sources: \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[Corab S.A. - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/corab) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[PV Tech - Top 50 Most Bankable Module Suppliers\](https://www.pv-tech.org/top-50-most-bankable-module-suppliers-in-the-pv-industry-today/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Corab](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-corab) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs Corab](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-corab) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Corab](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-corab) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-corab Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.