--- title: "AEET vs CELLINE - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs CELLINE solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-celline" --- # AEET vs CELLINE AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 0 models). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | | | Headquarters | | | | Founded | | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | | | Website | | | Celline is a brand of small-wattage photovoltaic modules (10W–40W) primarily sold in Poland, targeting off-grid and low-power applications. Their panels feature monocrystalline cells on a rigid composite frame with anti-reflective glass and are distributed through Polish solar equipment retailers. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | CELLINE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 0 | +5 | | Max Power | 200 W | 0 W | +200 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 0 W | +190 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | CELLINE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | CELLINE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | - | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AEET | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Power distribution | Power band | AEET | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | AEET | CELLINE | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German company headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Lower Saxony, with roots in the photovoltaic industry going back to around 2004. It presents itself primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale partner, working alongside panel manufacturers rather than functioning as a large-scale primary producer. No credible third-party source found during this research places AEET on a BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, and its production footprint appears modest relative to the multi-gigawatt Chinese and Korean majors that typically dominate that classification. CELLINE, by contrast, returned no usable results across multiple targeted searches of industry databases, review platforms, and trade press - it does not appear in ENF Solar directories, PV Tech coverage, or any mainstream bankability ranking, making it impossible to characterize its origin, scale, or institutional standing from public sources. On the product side, AEET offers own-branded crystalline modules under its SE series, with datasheets on file at ENF Solar suggesting older monocrystalline PERC-era designs as well as more recent TOPCon-technology offerings. The company's self-described role as a full-service wholesale partner - covering procurement, installation support, and module repair for commercial and residential customers across Central Europe - positions it as a small regional specialist rather than a global supplier. Its stated product warranty is ten years and its performance guarantee runs to 25 years, which is standard but not exceptional by current market norms. No independent field-test data or third-party efficiency rankings for CELLINE panels could be located, so a like-for-like product comparison is not possible. For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand sits in the mainstream Tier 1 shortlist that most project financiers or large EPCs would use as a default. AEET at least has a documented European track record and a public product catalog. CELLINE's absence from every major industry directory and review platform means a buyer would be taking on considerably more due-diligence risk, and caution is strongly advised until verified product documentation and third-party test data can be obtained. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar company profile \| article \- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/solarmodule.php \| AEET Energy Group solar modules product page \| article \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal buyer profile \| review \- https://www.top50-solar.de/de/teilnehmer/id/7183/aeet-energy.com.html \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - Top50 Solar Germany listing \| article Sources: \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[AEET Energy Group solar modules\](https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/solarmodule.php) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[AEET Energy Group - Top50 Solar Germany\](https://www.top50-solar.de/de/teilnehmer/id/7183/aeet-energy.com.html) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs CELLINE](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-celline) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs CELLINE](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-celline) - [AEET vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs CELLINE](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-celline) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-celline Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.