--- title: "AEET vs ARTsolar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AEET vs ARTsolar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar" --- # AEET vs ARTsolar AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 0 models). ## The two companies | Attribute | AEET | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | South Africa | | Headquarters | | Durban | | Founded | | 2010 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.artsolar.co.za](https://www.artsolar.co.za) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AEET | ARTsolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 5 | 0 | +5 | | Max Power | 200 W | 0 W | +200 W | | Avg Power | 190 W | 0 W | +190 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AEET | ARTsolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 15.70% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 14.90% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AEET | ARTsolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | - | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AEET | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Power distribution | Power band | AEET | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | AEET | ARTsolar | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 5 (100.0%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET and ARTsolar occupy very different positions in the global solar supply chain. AEET is a manufacturer with minimal public institutional footprint - no confirmed headquarters country, founding year, or production capacity appears in available industry databases, and it does not hold Tier 1 bankability status with Bloomberg NEF. ARTsolar, by contrast, is a 100% South African-owned company founded in Durban in 2010, operating a 325 MW assembly facility in KwaZulu-Natal through a formal technology and manufacturing partnership with Talesun Solar, itself a globally ranked Tier 1 supplier. ARTsolar is not independently Tier 1 bankable, but its Talesun affiliation gives it a materially stronger institutional footing than AEET. The two lineups diverge sharply on technical specifications. AEET's five-panel portfolio averages 190 Wp and 14.9% efficiency, peaking at 200 Wp and 15.7% - performance levels characteristic of older polycrystalline or entry-grade monocrystalline technology, with cell type listed as unknown. That puts AEET firmly in the territory of budget retrofit projects or low-demand off-grid applications where first cost is the dominant factor. ARTsolar's single tracked panel runs at 600 Wp with 23.21% efficiency using TOPCon cell technology, alongside a temperature coefficient of -0.31% per degree Celsius - a figure competitive with mainstream premium modules. ARTsolar backs that panel with a 30-year performance warranty versus AEET's 25 years. Neither manufacturer offers bifacial options in the portfolios profiled here. For most buyers evaluating these two in 2025, ARTsolar is the stronger default choice. Its 600 Wp TOPCon module suits space-constrained commercial rooftops and mid-scale ground mounts that benefit from high power density, and the longer warranty reduces long-run revenue risk. AEET's lower-power, lower-efficiency panels could still serve a cost-sensitive buyer with simple balance-of-system requirements, but the absence of any verifiable institutional record makes financing and bankability harder to secure. Unless AEET's pricing represents a decisive project-level saving and warranty risk can be mitigated contractually, ARTsolar's technical and corporate profile is the more defensible specification. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/11/07/talesun-artsolar-open-325-mw-module-factory-in-south-africa/ \| Talesun and ARTsolar open 325 MW module factory in South Africa \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/talesun-and-artsolar-begin-operations-on-325mw-pv-manufacturing-facility-in-south-africa/ \| Talesun and ARTsolar begin operations on 325 MW PV manufacturing facility \| article \- https://www.climatescorecard.org/2025/02/artsolar-in-south-africa/ \| ARTsolar in South Africa - Climate Scorecard profile \| article \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-tier-1-vs-tier-2-solar-panels \| Tier 1 vs Tier 2 solar panels - bankability explained \| article Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar) - [AEET vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [AEET vs ASM](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-asm) - [AU Optronics vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-artsolar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-artsolar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.