---
title: "AE Solar vs Ulica Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Ulica Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ulica-solar"
---

# AE Solar vs Ulica Solar

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 76 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Jiaxing |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Employees | 501-1000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.ulicasolar.com](https://www.ulicasolar.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 76 | +570 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 715 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 564 W | +75 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.88% | +0.55 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 22.26% | +1.15 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.303%/°C | +0.009 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 44 (58%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 29.3 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Ulica Solar skews to higher efficiency: 14% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 4 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 16 (21.1%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 45 (59.2%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 11 (14.5%) |


## Power distribution

Ulica Solar offers more 600W+ panels (43% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 1 (1.3%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 22 (28.9%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 20 (26.3%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 29 (38.2%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 4 (5.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 72 (94.7%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 4 (5.3%) |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Ulica Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [UL-715M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [UL-710M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-710m-132dgn) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [UL-705M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-705m-132dgn) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [UL-700M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-700m-132dgn) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [UL-670M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [UL-670M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132hv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [UL-665M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [UL-665M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [UL-660M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [UL-660M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132hv) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Germany and has grown into one of Europe's most established photovoltaic module brands, with a production capacity exceeding 2 GW across manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status confirmed by Bloomberg NEF, which in 2024 ranked it as Europe's sole Tier 1 PV manufacturer with high bankability - a distinction further supported by its first-of-kind DIBt certification. With a portfolio spanning 442 panel models and a presence in over 95 countries, AE Solar operates at a scale and market reach that clearly differentiates it from Ulica Solar. Ulica Solar, established in 2014 and headquartered in Ningbo, China, is a more focused player backed by the Shanshan Group. It does not carry Tier 1 bankable status in the evaluated dataset, and its 76-model portfolio reflects a more targeted market approach concentrated almost entirely on TOPCon technology.

Both manufacturers have made TOPCon the cornerstone of their technology strategy, but with different portfolio compositions. Ulica Solar's lineup is nearly 95% TOPCon, compared to roughly 50% for AE Solar, which also covers other cell technologies. Ulica Solar achieves a higher average module power (approximately 564 Wp versus 497 Wp) and higher average efficiency (22.26% versus 21.34%), while AE Solar leads on peak values - maximum efficiency of 24.43% versus 23.88%, and maximum module power of 730 Wp versus 715 Wp. AE Solar's bifacial share (63.8% versus 57.9%) and broad portfolio make it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects. Ulica Solar's slightly more favorable temperature coefficient (-0.303%/°C versus -0.313%/°C) and high average module power give it an edge for space-constrained residential rooftop installs where energy density is the primary concern.

For international buyers where project bankability, financing eligibility, and product range breadth are priorities - particularly for utility-scale or C&I projects subject to lender due diligence - AE Solar holds a clear advantage. Ulica Solar is a compelling option for buyers focused on high average power output within a tightly standardized TOPCon lineup, and may appeal to residential or smaller commercial installers seeking strong performance metrics, provided Tier 1 bankability is not a hard requirement for the project.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ulica-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ulica-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.