--- title: "AE Solar vs Sunova - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar vs Sunova solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova" --- # AE Solar vs Sunova AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 183 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AE Solar | Sunova | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Germany | China | | Headquarters | Gersthofen | Hefei | | Founded | 2003 | 2008 | | Employees | 501-1000 | | | Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) | AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AE Solar | Sunova | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 646 | 183 | +463 | | Max Power | 730 W | 720 W | +10 W | | Avg Power | 489 W | 523 W | +34 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AE Solar | Sunova | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.20% | +1.23 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 21.60% | +0.49 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AE Solar | Sunova | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.005 | | Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 168 (92%) | +29 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.3 yr | ## Efficiency distribution AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AE Solar | Sunova | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 46 (25.1%) | | 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 70 (38.3%) | | 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 57 (31.1%) | | 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 10 (5.5%) | ## Power distribution Sunova offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup) | Power band | AE Solar | Sunova | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 84 (45.9%) | | 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 58 (31.7%) | | 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 31 (16.9%) | | 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 10 (5.5%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%) | Technology | AE Solar | Sunova | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 12 (6.6%) | | PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 89 (48.6%) | | Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 72 (39.3%) | | BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 | | HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 10 (5.5%) | ## Top panels, AE Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Sunova | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AE Solar and Sunova represent two distinct positions in the global solar PV market. AE Solar, founded in 2003 and headquartered in Königsbrunn, Germany, manufactures its modules across facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, and holds Tier 1 bankable status - a key credential for project finance. The company was recognized as a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer in 2025 and received top marks from PV Magazine for its Meteor module series. Sunova, founded in 2008 and based in Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, operates manufacturing plants in China and Vietnam and announced a 9 GW cell factory in Sichuan in 2024, signaling aggressive capacity expansion. According to available data, Sunova does not currently hold Tier 1 bankable status, which limits its accessibility in bank-financed projects. On the technology side, AE Solar leads with a broader portfolio of 442 panel models, a maximum output of 730 Wp, and peak efficiency of 24.43%, with TOPCon as the dominant cell technology (nearly 50% of its lineup). Its average temperature coefficient of -0.313%/°C and near-30-year average warranty make it well-suited for residential rooftop installations and commercial C&I projects where long-term yield guarantees matter. Sunova's strength lies in its heavily bifacial portfolio - 91.8% of its 183-panel lineup is bifacial, compared to 63.8% for AE Solar - and its higher average panel power of around 523 Wp versus 497 Wp for AE Solar. This makes Sunova a competitive option for utility-scale ground-mount projects and flat-roof commercial installations where bifacial gain can be fully exploited. For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on project type and financing requirements. AE Solar's Tier 1 bankable status, larger and more technologically advanced product portfolio, and stronger independent test recognitions make it the lower-risk choice for residential, C&I, and financed utility projects. Sunova's bifacial-first lineup and competitive average power output offer tangible value in large ground-mount scenarios, though buyers should carefully verify warranty terms and local service availability before committing to projects at scale. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AEET vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-sunova) - [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sunova) - [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sunova) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.