---
title: "AE Solar vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp"
---

# AE Solar vs Sharp

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 19 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | Japan |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture |
| Founded | 2003 | 1912 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 40,123 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 15.4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | TYO: 6753 |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 19 | +627 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 740 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 576 W | +87 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.82% | +0.61 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 22.20% | +1.09 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.012 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 10 (53%) | +10 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 27.6 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 1 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 6 (31.6%) |


## Power distribution

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 7 (36.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 7 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sharp


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier in Königsbrunn, Germany, growing from a family-run business into one of Europe's most recognized solar module manufacturers. The company maintains its headquarters in Germany while operating manufacturing plants in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW. AE Solar holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and was ranked 18th out of 67 evaluated manufacturers in the Global PV Module and Inverter Bankability 2024 report - identified as the sole European Tier 1 producer with high bankability that year, with its bankability rating rising from 26% in 2023 to 50% in 2024. Sharp, by contrast, is a Japanese electronics conglomerate with over 60 years of solar manufacturing history, having produced its first photovoltaic cells in the 1950s. Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation (SESJ), headquartered in Japan, distributes panels across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the UK, but is not currently sold in the United States. Sharp does not appear in recent publicly available BloombergNEF Tier 1 confirmations, giving AE Solar the stronger institutional standing of the two.

AE Solar serves residential rooftop, commercial C&I, and utility-scale segments. Its Aurora series uses P-type PERC technology, while the Meteor series is built on N-type TOPCon cells - the Meteor earned a five-star rating in PV Magazine module testing and received the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award 2025, underscoring its suitability for demanding projects. Sharp's current lineup spans standard residential modules up to high-power commercial panels in the 610 W range, the latest of which also use N-type TOPCon technology. Sharp carries a 30-year performance warranty guaranteeing 87.5% output retention by year 30, which ranks among the stronger guarantees in the industry. Both brands target overlapping end-use segments, though Sharp positions itself at the premium end of the price scale.

For international buyers, AE Solar offers a well-documented Tier 1 track record, competitive pricing relative to its European brand positioning, and independently verified module performance - making it a strong choice for projects where bankability and installer-network support are priorities. Sharp's long brand heritage and robust warranty terms appeal to buyers valuing institutional longevity, particularly in commercial or public-sector projects. For most residential and light commercial rooftop applications the two brands are broadly comparable in cell technology, with AE Solar currently holding a clearer and better-documented advantage in European bankability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-sharp)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sharp)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sharp)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.