---
title: "AE Solar vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim"
---

# AE Solar vs Seraphim

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 160 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2003 | 2011 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 160 | +486 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 730 W |  |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 549 W | +60 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.50% | +0.93 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 21.82% | +0.71 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 111 (69%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 11 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 4 (2.5%) |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 6 (3.8%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar and Seraphim are both Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable manufacturers with meaningfully different market profiles. AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Germany and has built its brand around German engineering standards, with actual production spread across facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, giving it a combined annual capacity exceeding 2 GW. Seraphim, established in 2011 in Changzhou, China, operates at a significantly larger scale with 13 GW of production capacity and panels installed in more than 100 countries - placing it among the more prominent mid-tier Chinese manufacturers competing in European and global markets. Both companies have made TOPCon the dominant cell technology in their current portfolios, and both now offer modules reaching 730 Wp at peak. The key differentiators lie in efficiency leadership and portfolio focus: AE Solar claims a higher maximum module efficiency of 24.43% versus Seraphim's 23.5%, while Seraphim leads in average panel output at around 551 Wp compared to AE Solar's 497 Wp, reflecting a tighter, higher-power product lineup.

In terms of specific strengths, AE Solar's broad catalog of 442 module variants - combined with an average warranty of nearly 30 years and its distinction as the first DIBt-certified Tier 1 manufacturer in the industry - makes it a strong fit for residential rooftop installations and smaller commercial projects where product variety, European compliance documentation, and brand credibility with end customers matter. Its positioning as a German-branded manufacturer also gives it a marketing edge in markets where European provenance commands a premium. Seraphim, on the other hand, suits utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial C&I projects particularly well: its higher bifacial share of nearly 73% (versus AE Solar's 64%), higher average module power, and substantial manufacturing scale translate into stable supply chains and competitive pricing at volume. The company's 12 GW annual shipments and growing European distribution network make it a credible choice for developers and EPCs procuring at scale.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely hinges on project type and procurement priorities. AE Solar is the more compelling option when European certification, a diverse product range, or customer-facing brand perception are factors. Seraphim offers a stronger value proposition for high-volume procurement in utility-scale or C&I contexts, where its larger production base, higher average wattage, and extensive global track record provide practical advantages.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-seraphim)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-seraphim)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.