---
title: "AE Solar vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy"
---

# AE Solar vs Runergy

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 124 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 124 | +522 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 740 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 579 W | +90 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 24.10% | +0.33 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 22.42% | +1.31 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 95 (77%) | +14 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Königsbrunn, Germany, by three brothers - Alexander, Victor, and Waldemar Maier - and has since grown into one of Europe's most prominent privately held PV module manufacturers. The company operates manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual production capacity of 2.5 GW. AE Solar achieved its 16th consecutive placement on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer list in Q1 2025 and is recognized by BloombergNEF as Europe's sole Tier 1 manufacturer with a High Bankability rating. The company distributes to more than 100 countries. Runergy (Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.) was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Yancheng, Jiangsu, China. Originating as a cell-focused manufacturer, Runergy ranked among the top three global PV cell producers by shipment volume for three consecutive years from 2020 to 2022, with cumulative cell shipments exceeding 65 GW by end of 2023. Runergy has maintained BNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters through Q1 2025 and holds a BB rating in the Q4 2024 PV ModuleTech Bankability Report. In terms of institutional footprint in Europe, AE Solar holds a stronger position given its German brand identity and longer track record.

AE Solar's product portfolio centers on N-type TOPCon technology, with key series including Meteor, Aurora, and Terra covering a power range suited to residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and utility-scale ground-mount systems. Bifacial and monofacial configurations are both available. Runergy similarly focuses on N-type TOPCon modules designed for residential, C&I, and utility-scale applications. The company has expanded its global manufacturing footprint beyond China to include production bases in Thailand and, as of late 2024, a module manufacturing facility in Huntsville, Alabama, making it an increasingly relevant supplier for the U.S. market. In Europe, Runergy has been active in Denmark, Sweden, and Poland, and participated in Poland's ENEX Expo in early 2024 alongside appointing a dedicated local representative.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely hinges on strategic priorities. AE Solar's European headquarters and long-established bankability record make it a natural fit for project finance contexts and European tenders where provenance matters. Runergy's scale as a top-tier cell producer and its vertically integrated capacity - potentially reaching 63 GW of cell output - can translate into competitive pricing and supply reliability at volume, making it particularly attractive for larger C&I and utility-scale procurement. For straightforward residential or small commercial purchases, the two are broadly interchangeable given that both carry equivalent Tier 1 and bankability credentials and offer current-generation N-type TOPCon technology.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-runergy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-runergy)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.