--- title: "AE Solar vs Panasonic - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar vs Panasonic solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-panasonic" --- # AE Solar vs Panasonic AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 25 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AE Solar | Panasonic | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Germany | Japan | | Headquarters | Gersthofen | Kadoma, near Ōsaka | | Founded | 2003 | 1918 | | Employees | 501-1000 | 9,500+ | | Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 1+ GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | | Tokyo Stock Exchange: 6752 | | Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.panasonic.com/global/energy/](https://www.panasonic.com/global/energy/) | AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and... Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing the quality... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AE Solar | Panasonic | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 646 | 25 | +621 | | Max Power | 730 W | 430 W | +300 W | | Avg Power | 489 W | 367 W | +121 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AE Solar | Panasonic | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 22.20% | +2.23 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 20.68% | +0.42 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AE Solar | Panasonic | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.267%/°C | +0.045 | | Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 4 (16%) | +47 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +4.7 yr | ## Efficiency distribution AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AE Solar | Panasonic | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 6 (24.0%) | | 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 8 (32.0%) | | 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 8 (32.0%) | | 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 3 (12.0%) | | 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup) | Power band | AE Solar | Panasonic | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 19 (76.0%) | | 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 6 (24.0%) | | 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%) Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (88%) | Technology | AE Solar | Panasonic | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 3 (12.0%) | | Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 | | BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 | | HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 22 (88.0%) | ## Top panels, AE Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Panasonic | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [EVPV430HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv430hk2) | 430 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [EVPV420HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv420hk2) | 420 | 21.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [EVPV410H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410h) | 410 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [EVPV410HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410hk) | 410 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [EVPV400H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400h) | 400 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [EVPV400HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400hk) | 400 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [EVPV390HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv390hk) | 390 | 21.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [EVPV390H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv390h) | 390 | 21.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [EVPV380](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv380) | 380 | 21.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [EVPV370](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv370) | 370 | 21.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AE Solar was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier and his siblings in Königsbrunn, Germany, and is headquartered in Gersthofen, Germany. The company operates manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW. AE Solar has held continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 status since 2021 and ranked 18th out of 67 evaluated manufacturers in BNEF's Global PV Module Bankability 2024 report - the only European manufacturer recognized with high bankability that year. Its bankability score rose from 26% in 2023 to 50% in 2024, and the company's Meteor module earned a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award in 2025. Panasonic, a Japanese electronics conglomerate founded in 1918, entered solar through its Sanyo subsidiary, which began solar cell research in 1975 and pioneered heterojunction (HJT) cell technology from 1990 onward, commercializing it in 1997 under the HIT brand. After acquiring Sanyo in 2009-2011, Panasonic continued selling HJT modules under its EverVolt brand, but ceased in-house manufacturing in 2022, outsourcing production to third parties including REC Group. On April 28, 2025, Panasonic North America formally announced the discontinuation of its entire solar and battery storage product lines. From an institutional standpoint, AE Solar is clearly the active commercial entity - Panasonic has effectively exited the solar market. AE Solar's current portfolio centers on two families: the Aurora Series (P-type PERC) for cost-sensitive applications and the Meteor Series (N-type TOPCon, module efficiency up to approximately 22.57%) targeting higher-performance segments. Both lines address residential rooftop installations, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and utility-scale ground-mount deployments across more than 95 countries. Panasonic's EverVolt HJT panels were historically prized for their low temperature coefficient, minimal light-induced degradation, and efficiencies exceeding 22% in the latest models - positioning them as a premium residential and small commercial option. Since manufacturing has ceased, no new Panasonic modules are entering distribution channels. For international buyers, the comparison is effectively settled by circumstance rather than technical preference: Panasonic is no longer a viable procurement option for new projects. AE Solar, backed by confirmed BNEF Tier 1 bankability and a recent PVEL Top Performer recognition, represents a credible and actively supplied choice across residential, C&I, and utility-scale segments. Existing Panasonic system owners are covered by warranty commitments, but project developers and installers sourcing new capacity should treat Panasonic as a closed chapter and evaluate AE Solar on its own merits against other active manufacturers. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AEET vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-panasonic) - [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-panasonic) - [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Panasonic](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-panasonic) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-panasonic Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.