---
title: "AE Solar vs Neo Solar Power - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Neo Solar Power solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-neo-solar-power"
---

# AE Solar vs Neo Solar Power

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 30 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | Taiwan |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Hsinchu |
| Founded | 2003 | 2005 |
| Employees | 501-1000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.nsp.com](https://www.nsp.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 30 | +616 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 715 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 535 W | +46 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.03% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 21.79% | +0.68 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.320%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 20 (67%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 27.5 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 1 (3.3%) |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 4 (13.3%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 11 (36.7%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 12 (40.0%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 2 (6.7%) |


## Power distribution

Neo Solar Power offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 1 (3.3%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 14 (46.7%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 5 (16.7%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 6 (20.0%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 4 (13.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Neo Solar Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 20 (66.7%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 10 (33.3%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Neo Solar Power


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NESE 715-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-715-66thb-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NESE 710-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-710-66thb-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NESE 705-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-705-66thb-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NESE 700-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-700-66thb-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NESE 695-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-695-66thb-g12) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NESE 675-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-675-66mht-g12) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NESE 670-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-670-66mht-g12) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NESE 665-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-665-66mht-g12) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NESE 660-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-660-66mht-g12) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NESE 655-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-655-66mht-g12) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier in Königsbrunn, Germany, starting as a family business and expanding into a brand active in more than 95 countries. The company operates manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a stated combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW. AE Solar has maintained a Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 ranking for over a dozen consecutive quarters and was described in 2024 as Europe's sole Tier 1 PV manufacturer with high bankability in the BNEF survey - a distinction that gives it a notably stronger institutional footprint than most European-branded competitors. Neo Solar Power is a Taiwanese solar cell and module producer founded in 2005 and headquartered in Hsinchu. In 2018 it merged with Gintech Energy and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy Co., Ltd. (URE), which is listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. At its peak, Neo Solar Power was the largest solar cell manufacturer in Taiwan by revenue, and the Neo Solar Power name continues to appear in some distribution channels, though the parent entity now operates primarily as URE. No Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 listing was found for URE or Neo Solar Power in available sources.

AE Solar addresses both the residential rooftop and commercial C&I segments. Its current product lineup spans P-type PERC modules (Aurora Series, up to approximately 415 W) and N-type TOPCon modules (Meteor Series, up to approximately 440 W and 22.57% efficiency), with the TOPCon line earning a five-star rating in PV Magazine's independent performance test. DIBt certification and consistent BNEF bankability recognition make AE Solar a practical choice for projects requiring lender or insurer approval. Neo Solar Power - URE manufactures monocrystalline modules including bifacial and TOPCon variants, and the company is actively developing perovskite technology targeting conversion rates above 26%. URE's commercial focus is on the United States and European markets, spanning both utility-scale and C&I applications, with over 400 MW reported as installed in the US.

For international buyers prioritizing bankability, lender acceptance, and a well-documented European brand identity, AE Solar presents a clearer value proposition - its continuous Tier 1 status and European quality positioning reduce due diligence risk for project finance. Neo Solar Power - URE carries genuine Taiwanese manufacturing heritage and is an active technology developer, but its lower profile on major bankability lists and more limited third-party review data make it a less straightforward choice for buyers who need fast institutional sign-off. The two brands are not interchangeable in that context, though for buyers less constrained by financing requirements both can represent reasonable mid-tier options.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Neo Solar Power](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-neo-solar-power)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Neo Solar Power](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-neo-solar-power)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Neo Solar Power](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-neo-solar-power)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-neo-solar-power

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.