---
title: "AE Solar vs Lina Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Lina Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-lina-energy"
---

# AE Solar vs Lina Energy

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 37 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | United Kingdom |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Lancaster |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 28 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.lina.energy/](https://www.lina.energy/) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 37 | +609 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 550 W | +180 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 402 W | +87 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 22.37% | +2.06 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 20.32% | +0.79 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.352%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 7 (19%) | +44 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 12 (32.4%) |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 6 (16.2%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 12 (32.4%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 7 (18.9%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 18 (48.6%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 15 (40.5%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 4 (10.8%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (30%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 11 (29.7%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 1 (2.7%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 4 (10.8%) |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 8 (21.6%) |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 13 (35.1%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Lina Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LEPV 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LEPV 550 (LEPV 144 HALF-CUT PLUS)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550-lepv-144-half-cut-plus) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LEPV 132 HC ICON PLUS 500Wp (BLACK - STANDARD - BICOLOUR)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-hc-icon-plus-500wp-black-standard-bicolour) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LEPV 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-500) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LEPV 480](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LEPV 475](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-475) | 475 | 21.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LEPV 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-460) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LEPV 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-450) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LEPV 132 ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK 440Wp (LEPV 440)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-ultra-premium-black-440wp-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LEPV 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier and his siblings in Königsbrunn, Bavaria, and is now headquartered in Gersthofen, Germany. Over two decades the company grew from a family-run operation into a globally recognized module brand with manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, reaching a combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW according to company and industry sources. In BloombergNEF's 2024 Global PV Module Bankability survey the firm ranked 18th out of 67 evaluated manufacturers and secured its 16th consecutive Tier 1 designation, distinguishing itself as the only European module manufacturer to achieve high bankability status in that report. Lina Energy, by contrast, is a smaller producer headquartered in Bulgaria and founded around 2016, with branch offices in Jordan, Italy, and China. No confirmed production capacity figures or BloombergNEF Tier 1 listings for Lina Energy appear in publicly available sources, placing AE Solar clearly ahead on institutional footprint and third-party validation.

AE Solar's product portfolio targets residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale applications across Europe and beyond. Its current lineup centers on the Aurora series using P-type PERC cell technology and the Meteor series using N-type TOPCon cells, the latter earning a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award in 2025 and a five-star rating in PV Magazine module testing. Lina Energy offers a broader range of panel types - including monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and TOPCon modules in power classes comparable to mainstream market offerings - and appears to position itself primarily for residential and light commercial projects, though detailed field-test data from independent reviewers is sparse.

For international buyers weighing the two, AE Solar carries meaningfully stronger third-party validation: consecutive Tier 1 bankability rankings, independent lab performance awards, and a well-documented global supply chain. Lina Energy may appeal to price-sensitive buyers or those sourcing from a European-adjacent manufacturer, but the limited publicly available performance data and absence from bankability rankings represent real due-diligence gaps. Unless a project has specific cost constraints that Lina Energy addresses, AE Solar is the lower-risk choice for buyers who require documented bankability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-lina-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-lina-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-lina-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-lina-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.