---
title: "AE Solar vs Jinergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Jinergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinergy"
---

# AE Solar vs Jinergy

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 10 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen |  |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Employees | 501-1000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 10 | +636 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 510 W | +220 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 478 W | +11 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.27% | +1.16 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 21.93% | +0.83 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Jinergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 5 (50%) | +13 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 2 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 2 (20.0%) |


## Power distribution

AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 7 (70.0%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 3 (30.0%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Jinergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 5 (50.0%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar (AESOLAR Energy GmbH) was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier and his brothers Victor and Waldemar in Königsbrunn, Germany, where the company remains headquartered. Over the following two decades it built manufacturing facilities in China (2009), Georgia (2019), and Turkey (2021), reaching a combined annual production capacity of approximately 2.5 GW. In Q1 2025, AE Solar was included for the sixteenth consecutive time on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer list, reinforcing its bankability with project financiers worldwide. The company also received the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award 2025 and a five-star rating from PV Magazine for its Meteor module. Jinergy - the trade name for Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd. - is a China-based manufacturer operating under the Jinneng Holding Group, a large state-linked Chinese energy conglomerate. Jinergy has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status since at least 2019, maintaining it for at least four consecutive years according to available sources. Its historical total shipments exceeded 6.5 GW by end of 2020, with confirmed exports to more than 30 countries. On institutional footprint and European brand recognition, AE Solar holds a clearer advantage given its German founding, European headquarters, and longer continuous Tier 1 track record.

AE Solar's portfolio covers modules suited to residential rooftop installations, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and utility-scale ground-mount systems. The company differentiates itself through a 30-year product warranty - unusually long by industry standards - and independently verified performance results from third-party laboratories. Jinergy's product line spans PERC monocrystalline, N-type TOPCon, and HJT modules, the latter having been commercially launched as early as 2017. Its TOPCon series has obtained French carbon footprint certification, which supports access to European markets with stricter environmental procurement criteria. In India, Jinergy was reported to rank second among Chinese module exporters with a market share of close to 10%, indicating strong execution in large emerging markets beyond Europe.

For international buyers choosing between the two, AE Solar is the stronger pick for European-facing projects where brand recognition, warranty terms, and third-party test results weigh heavily in procurement decisions. Jinergy is a credible alternative - particularly where HJT or TOPCon technology is prioritized and price competitiveness is a key factor - but its distribution network and market presence in Central and Eastern Europe appear less established. Neither brand is a tier-one global giant, but both occupy a solid upper mid-tier position; for utility-scale buyers with access to both, a head-to-head technical and commercial evaluation is advisable rather than treating them as interchangeable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-jinergy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-jinergy)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-jinergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.