---
title: "AE Solar vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai"
---

# AE Solar vs Hyundai

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 65 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2003 | 2004 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 65 | +581 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 640 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 442 W | +46 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.40% | +1.03 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 21.49% | +0.38 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.012 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 43 (66%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 3 (4.6%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 6 (9.2%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar and Hyundai Energy Solutions are both Tier 1 bankable solar panel manufacturers, yet they differ considerably in scale, technology focus, and market positioning. AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Königsbrunn, Germany, by Alexander Maier and his siblings, and has grown to employ between 501 and 1,000 people across manufacturing sites in China, Georgia, and Turkey, giving the company a production capacity exceeding 2 GW and a presence in over 95 countries. Hyundai Energy Solutions, founded a year later in 2004 and headquartered in South Korea, is a smaller and more focused operation with around 206 employees and a production capacity of 1.35 GW; it is publicly listed on the Korea Stock Exchange, adding a layer of financial transparency that institutional buyers often value. Both companies hold Bloomberg Tier 1 status, underlining their bankability for project finance purposes.

Technology and portfolio breadth are where the two manufacturers diverge most clearly. AE Solar fields a broad catalogue of 442 panel models led by N-type TOPCon technology (roughly 50% of its lineup), with a peak output of 730 Wp, a maximum module efficiency of 24.43%, and an average warranty of nearly 30 years - a figure supported by its Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award 2025 and a five-star PV Magazine rating for TOPCon modules. This wide product range makes AE Solar suitable for everything from residential rooftop installs requiring compact, high-power formats to utility-scale ground-mount projects demanding robust long-term performance guarantees. Hyundai Energy Solutions offers a more curated portfolio of 65 models anchored by HJT technology (38.5% of its range), with a peak output of 640 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 23.4%. Its key competitive edge lies in a slightly better average temperature coefficient of -0.300%/°C compared to AE Solar's -0.313%/°C, and a marginally higher average module efficiency of 21.49% versus 21.34%, making Hyundai panels a strong fit for commercial C&I projects and bifacial ground-mount arrays where thermal performance and rear-side energy harvest matter most.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely hinges on project type and supply-chain preference. AE Solar's European headquarters, expansive portfolio, and independently validated module quality make it a versatile choice across residential, commercial, and utility segments, particularly where local EU-based support and long warranty terms are priorities. Hyundai Energy Solutions suits buyers who prioritize a publicly accountable, exchange-listed supplier with a tightly managed product range optimized for bifacial and thermally demanding applications. Both manufacturers are credible, bankable options - the right choice depends on the specific installation context and the buyer's risk and support requirements.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-hyundai)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-hyundai)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.