---
title: "AE Solar vs Hansol - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Hansol solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hansol"
---

# AE Solar vs Hansol

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 22 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Seoul |
| Founded | 2003 | 1965 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 11,000+ |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 0-1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange (KRX): 004150 |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.hansol.com](https://www.hansol.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Hansol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 22 | +624 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 360 W | +370 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 336 W | +153 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Hansol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 18.05% | +6.38 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 17.10% | +4.01 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Hansol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.445%/°C | +0.133 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 0 (0%) | +63 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +4.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 22 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 22 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 22 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hansol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TD-AN3](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TD-AN3-360](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TD-AN3 360W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360w) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TD-AN3-355](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TD-AN3 355W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355w) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TD-AN3-350](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TD-AN3 350W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350w) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TD-AN3-345](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TD-AN3 345W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345w) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TD-AN3-340](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-340) | 340 | 17.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar is a German solar manufacturer founded in 2003 and headquartered in Gersthofen, Bavaria, operating under the legal name AE Alternative Energy GmbH. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and in 2024 was recognized as Europe's sole Tier 1 PV manufacturer with high bankability - ranked 18th among 67 evaluated brands, with a bankability score of 50%. That designation carries real weight in project finance, where lenders assess whether a manufacturer's modules qualify for non-recourse loans on utility-scale and commercial projects. With annual production capacity exceeding 2 GW, AE Solar operates at a scale considerably larger than most European-aligned brands. Hansol, trading as Hansol Technics, is a South Korean manufacturer that launched its solar module business in 2010 and has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for several years. The company commands over 20% market share in South Korea and runs its Ochang plant at roughly 600 MW of annual capacity - a credible figure, but substantially smaller. On institutional standing in the European and international project-finance context, AE Solar currently holds the stronger position.

AE Solar's portfolio spans the full application spectrum through clearly differentiated product lines. The Meteor series uses N-type TOPCon cell technology and reaches module outputs up to 725 W, targeting utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial rooftop projects. The Comet series is built on HJT technology and achieves module efficiency of up to 23.05%, suited to premium residential and commercial rooftop segments. Specialized lines such as the Terra series address agrivoltaics, solar noise barriers, and fencing - niche but growing categories in European and Asian energy policy frameworks. Hansol Technics offers a diversified technology mix spanning PERC, TOPCon, and HJT, with bifacial TOPCon modules covering the 560-730 Wp power range. The Hansol catalog is well suited to residential rooftop and commercial C&I buyers, though its high-power utility offering is narrower relative to AE Solar.

For most international buyers, AE Solar is the stronger default choice: greater manufacturing scale, a unique high-bankability designation in the European market, and a broader portfolio that includes specialty mounting applications. Hansol Technics is a solid Tier 1 alternative, particularly where Korean-manufactured panels are preferred by local procurement rules or where AE Solar is not stocked by regional distributors. For standard residential or light commercial rooftop installations, the two brands are broadly interchangeable on performance and warranty terms, and local pricing and distributor relationships will typically drive the decision more than any fundamental quality difference.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Hansol](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-hansol)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Hansol](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-hansol)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Hansol](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-hansol)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hansol

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.