---
title: "AE Solar vs EGing PV - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs EGing PV solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-eging-pv"
---

# AE Solar vs EGing PV

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 131 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | EGing PV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2003 | 2003 |
| Employees | 501-1000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600537 |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | EGing PV | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 131 | +515 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 685 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 504 W | +16 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | EGing PV | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 22.45% | +1.98 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 20.90% | +0.21 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | EGing PV | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.336%/°C | +0.024 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 51 (39%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 26.9 yrs | +2.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | EGing PV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 13 (9.9%) |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 58 (44.3%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 51 (38.9%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 9 (6.9%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

EGing PV offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | EGing PV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 25 (19.1%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 40 (30.5%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 37 (28.2%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 29 (22.1%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%)


| Technology | AE Solar | EGing PV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 31 (23.7%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 100 (76.3%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, EGing PV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar and EGing PV share the same founding year - 2003 - yet have developed markedly different market identities over the past two decades. AE Solar, headquartered in Königsbrunn, Germany, markets itself as a European manufacturer upholding German quality standards, with a production capacity exceeding 2 GW spread across manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, and commercial reach spanning more than 95 countries. EGing PV is a Chinese manufacturer based in Changzhou, publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), with deep penetration across Asian and global markets. Both companies hold Tier 1 bankable status, confirming financial stability and suitability for project financing. In terms of portfolio breadth, AE Solar offers a considerably larger range of 442 panels compared to EGing PV's 131, reflecting a more diversified product strategy across wattage classes and end-market applications.

The two manufacturers diverge sharply in technology positioning. AE Solar has heavily invested in n-type TOPCon cells, which represent nearly 50% of its portfolio, and achieves a maximum module efficiency of 24.43% - among the highest in its tier - alongside an average portfolio efficiency of 21.34%. Its bifacial share stands at 63.8% and its average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.313%/°C, both of which favor utility-scale ground-mount deployments and installations in high-irradiance or warm climates where rear-side gain and thermal performance matter. An average warranty of nearly 30 years further strengthens its long-term yield proposition. EGing PV anchors roughly 74.8% of its portfolio in proven PERC technology, complemented by a growing TOPCon lineup (the Star Pro series), and delivers a slightly higher average power output of approximately 504 Wp. Its top-end modules reach 685 Wp with a maximum efficiency of 22.45%. The lower bifacial share of 38.9% and the PERC-dominant mix suggest a portfolio weighted toward residential rooftop and commercial rooftop applications where monofacial modules remain the practical standard.

For international buyers selecting between the two, AE Solar is the stronger fit when project requirements prioritize high module efficiency, bifacial yield gains, a superior temperature coefficient, and a longer warranty backstop - particularly for utility-scale ground-mount or premium commercial C&I projects in Europe, where the company's German headquarters and Turkish production footprint can also simplify local content and traceability compliance. EGing PV offers a compelling value proposition for cost-sensitive residential and mid-scale commercial deployments, especially in markets where PERC remains the dominant technology standard and where Tier 1 status and exchange listing provide sufficient bankability assurance for project lenders.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs EGing PV](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-eging-pv)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs EGing PV](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-eging-pv)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs EGing PV](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-eging-pv)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-eging-pv

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.