--- title: "AE Solar vs DAH - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar vs DAH solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-dah" --- # AE Solar vs DAH AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 0 models). AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AE Solar | DAH | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Germany | China | | Headquarters | Gersthofen | Hefei | | Founded | 2003 | 2009 | | Employees | 501-1000 | | | Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.dahsolarpv.com](https://www.dahsolarpv.com) | AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AE Solar | DAH | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 646 | 0 | +646 | | Max Power | 730 W | 0 W | +730 W | | Avg Power | 489 W | 0 W | +489 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AE Solar | DAH | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.43% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AE Solar | DAH | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 0 (0%) | +63 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AE Solar | DAH | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup) | Power band | AE Solar | DAH | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%) | Technology | AE Solar | DAH | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 0 | | Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 | | BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 | | HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AE Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AE Solar and DAH Solar are both BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, but they differ considerably in their origins, scale, and market positioning. AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Germany and maintains its headquarters in Gersthofen, operating manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey with a combined annual production capacity of over 2 GW. The company employs between 500 and 1,000 people, exports to more than 95 countries, and earned recognition as a PV Top Performer in 2023 for thermal cycling and mechanical stress resilience. DAH Solar, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Hefei, Anhui province, China, runs a 5 GW factory and has begun construction of a fully vertically integrated 10 GW plant in Shanxi province. With over 2,000 employees and 200 patents, DAH has grown into a mid-large tier Chinese manufacturer with an expanding presence in European distribution channels. On the technology side, both companies lead with TOPCon cell architecture, but DAH has committed more deeply to it - 81.2% of its 356-panel portfolio uses TOPCon, compared to 50.5% of AE Solar's 442-panel range. DAH Solar's panels carry a higher average module power of 521.8 Wp versus 496.96 Wp for AE Solar, and a higher average efficiency of 22.13% versus 21.34%. AE Solar holds the edge in peak single-module efficiency at 24.43% versus 23.34% for DAH. DAH Solar's average temperature coefficient of -0.298%/°C is marginally better than AE Solar's -0.297%/°C, a relevant advantage in hot climates or during peak summer conditions. DAH's bifacial share stands at 88.8% of its portfolio - notably higher than AE Solar's 63.8% - making DAH particularly well suited to utility-scale ground-mount and agrivoltaic installations where bifacial gain is a key economic driver. AE Solar's broad and balanced product range, combined with its European brand identity, makes it a strong fit for residential rooftop installs and commercial C&I projects where European warranty support and brand recognition matter to end customers. For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar offers a technically aggressive portfolio with higher average power output, deeper TOPCon penetration, and a strong bifacial lineup that suits large ground-mount and utility-scale procurement. AE Solar is the stronger choice when European origin, a well-established service network, and a diverse product catalogue spanning both PERC and TOPCon segments are priorities - particularly for residential and mid-scale commercial deployments in European markets. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AEET vs DAH](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-dah) - [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs DAH](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-dah) - [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs DAH](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-dah) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-dah Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.