---
title: "AE Solar vs AUSTA ENERGY - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs AUSTA ENERGY solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-austa-energy"
---

# AE Solar vs AUSTA ENERGY

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 58 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | India |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | Surat |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 200 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | 1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.austaenergy.com](https://www.austaenergy.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

AUSTA Energy is an Indian solar panel manufacturer based in Surat, Gujarat. The company produces monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules for residential and commercial applications, focusing on the domestic Indian market and select export markets.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 58 | +588 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 730 W |  |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 571 W | +82 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 23.50% | +0.93 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 21.85% | +0.75 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.295%/°C | +0.017 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 36 (62%) | +1 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 7 (12.1%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 24 (41.4%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 23 (39.7%) |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 4 (6.9%) |


## Power distribution

AUSTA ENERGY offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 12 (20.7%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 24 (41.4%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 15 (25.9%) |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 7 (12.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (55%)


| Technology | AE Solar | AUSTA ENERGY |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 32 (55.2%) |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 21 (36.2%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 1 (1.7%) |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 4 (6.9%) |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AUSTA ENERGY


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ODA730-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda730-33v-mhd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ODA725-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda725-33v-mhd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ODA720-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda720-33v-mhd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ODA715-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda715-33v-mhd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ODA710-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda710-33v-mhd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ODA705-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda705-33v-mhd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ODA700-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda700-33v-mhd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ODA695-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda695-33v-mhd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ODA640-30V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda640-30v-mhd) | 640 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ODA635-30V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda635-30v-mhd) | 635 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar is a German manufacturer founded in 2003 and headquartered in Königsbrunn, Germany, with annual production capacity exceeding 2 GW and a panel portfolio of 442 models. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and was recognized as Europe's sole Tier 1 PV manufacturer with high bankability in the 2024 BloombergNEF survey, with its bankability rating rising from 26% in 2023 to 50% in 2024. AE Solar operates manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, and in 2025 became the first DIBt-certified Tier 1 PV module maker while also earning the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award. AUSTA ENERGY, by contrast, is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2015 with approximately 200 employees and 1 GW of annual production capacity. It does not hold Tier 1 bankable status and maintains a narrower portfolio of 58 panel models, positioning it as a smaller, newer market entrant compared to AE Solar's two-decade track record.

Technologically, AE Solar's portfolio is led by TOPCon cell technology (49.8% of panels), with a maximum module efficiency of 24.43% and an average efficiency of 21.34%. Its bifacial share stands at 63.8% and average warranty is 29.72 years. The Meteor N-type TOPCon series earned a five-star rating from PV Magazine, making it well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and utility-scale ground-mount applications where bankability and long-term project financing are critical. AUSTA ENERGY's portfolio, though narrower, shows a higher average module power of 570.69 Wp versus AE Solar's 496.96 Wp, a slightly superior average efficiency of 21.85%, and a better average temperature coefficient of -0.295%/°C versus -0.313%/°C - meaning lower thermal losses in hot climates. Its N-type cell technology leads the portfolio at 46.55%, bifacial share is 62.07%, and the company offers a full 30-year product warranty. These characteristics make AUSTA competitive for C&I and ground-mount projects in warm climates where high power density and thermal performance are prioritized over bankability.

For international buyers choosing between the two, AE Solar is the stronger option wherever project financing, lender approval, or long-term asset management are involved - its Tier 1 status, European regulatory certifications, and established global reputation provide meaningful risk reduction. AUSTA ENERGY may appeal to buyers in markets with self-funded procurement where price competitiveness and high per-panel output matter more than bankability, though its limited portfolio depth and absence from Tier 1 lists warrant additional due diligence for large-scale deployments.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs AUSTA ENERGY](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-austa-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AUSTA ENERGY](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-austa-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AUSTA ENERGY](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-austa-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-austa-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.