---
title: "AE Solar vs Aptos Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AE Solar vs Aptos Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aptos-solar"
---

# AE Solar vs Aptos Solar

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 33 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AE Solar | Aptos Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Headquarters | Gersthofen | San Antonio, TX |
| Founded | 2003 | 2019 |
| Employees | 501-1000 | 14 |
| Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://www.aptossolar.com](https://www.aptossolar.com) |

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Aptos Solar Technology is a U.S. based company that leverages global sourcing to provide innovative and affordable solar technology. They offer high-performance solar panels optimized with their patented Dual Nano Absorber (DNA) technology for residential, commercial, and utility applications. The company is committed...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AE Solar | Aptos Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 646 | 33 | +613 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 550 W | +180 W |
| Avg Power | 489 W | 432 W | +57 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AE Solar | Aptos Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.43% | 21.29% | +3.14 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | 20.58% | +0.53 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AE Solar | Aptos Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.022 |
| Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 17 (52%) | +11 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AE Solar | Aptos Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 5 (15.2%) |
| 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 20 (60.6%) |
| 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 8 (24.2%) |
| 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)


| Power band | AE Solar | Aptos Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 6 (18.2%) |
| 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 24 (72.7%) |
| 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 3 (9.1%) |
| 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | AE Solar | Aptos Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 33 (100.0%) |
| Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Aptos Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-bf10-550w-dg) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.335 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-bf10-545w-dg) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.335 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DNA-144-BF10-540W-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-bf10-540w-dg) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.335 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DNA-120-MF10-460W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-mf10-460w) | 460 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DNA-120-BF10-460W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-bf10-460w) | 460 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DNA-120-MF10-455W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-mf10-455w) | 455 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DNA-120-BF10-455W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-bf10-455w) | 455 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DNA-144-MF26-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-mf26-450w) | 450 | 20.2 | -0.380 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DNA-120-BF10-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-bf10-450w) | 450 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DNA-120-MF10-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-mf10-450w) | 450 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 by Alexander Maier and his brothers in Königsbrunn, Bavaria, and has since grown into a manufacturer with production facilities in China, Turkey, and Georgia, reaching a combined annual output capacity of 2.5 GW. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for the sixteenth consecutive time as of Q1 2025, and was singled out by BNEF in 2024 as the only Tier 1 PV module manufacturer with a European headquarters - a distinction that carries real weight with lenders and project developers across the continent. Aptos Solar Technology, by contrast, is a much smaller and newer entrant: founded in 2019 by Alex Kim and Thanh Pham in Santa Clara, California, with manufacturing operations in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam, and a reported headcount of roughly 14 employees. Aptos is not listed on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 register, though it markets itself as a bankable supplier on the strength of its warranty terms. On any measure of institutional footprint or manufacturing scale, AE Solar is the larger and more established player.

AE Solar's current product range is centered on N-type TOPCon technology. Its flagship Meteor series reaches power outputs up to 725 W in bifacial double-glass configuration, and earned the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award 2025 alongside a five-star rating in PV Magazine module testing. The Aurora series covers a broad wattage range suited to residential rooftop and commercial installations, while the Terra series targets agrivoltaic and ground-mount utility applications. All products carry a 30-year product warranty, above the typical industry benchmark, and the company holds DIBt certification relevant for projects governed by German or DIN-aligned building standards. Aptos Solar's lineup relies primarily on half-cut PERC cells enhanced by its patented Dual Nano Absorber technology, with panel efficiencies reported between 19% and 20.6%. The company offers a 25-year product warranty and a 30-year performance warranty, and prices its modules competitively below most established Tier 1 brands.

For buyers prioritizing bankability, supply chain stability, and certified performance data - particularly in European project finance contexts - AE Solar is the more straightforward default choice. Aptos Solar can be a reasonable value option for smaller residential or commercial installs where project financing is not a factor, but its limited scale and absence from Tier 1 rankings make it a less suitable choice for large utility-scale or institutionally financed projects.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AE Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs Aptos Solar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-aptos-solar)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Aptos Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aptos-solar)
- [AE Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Aptos Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aptos-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aptos-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.