--- title: "AE Solar vs A.B. Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AE Solar vs A.B. Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy" --- # AE Solar vs A.B. Energy AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 0 models). AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Germany | Germany | | Headquarters | Gersthofen | Wiesbaden | | Founded | 2003 | 1996 | | Employees | 501-1000 | 1,400 | | Annual capacity | 2+ GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | | Xetra, Frankfurt Stock Exchange: AB9 | | Website | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) | [https://abo-energy.com](https://abo-energy.com) | AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and... ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 646 | 0 | +646 | | Max Power | 730 W | 0 W | +730 W | | Avg Power | 489 W | 0 W | +489 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.43% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 21.11% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.312%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 405 (63%) | 0 (0%) | +63 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 74 (11.5%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 171 (26.5%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 142 (22.0%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 199 (30.8%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 60 (9.3%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AE Solar offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup) | Power band | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 78 (12.1%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 329 (50.9%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 154 (23.8%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 55 (8.5%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 30 (4.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%) | Technology | AE Solar | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 349 (54.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 245 (37.9%) | 0 | | Back Contact | 21 (3.3%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (2.6%) | 0 | | BIPV | 9 (1.4%) | 0 | | HJT | 5 (0.8%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AE Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary A.B. Energy could not be verified through any authoritative industry source consulted during research, including the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module list, the ENF Solar manufacturer directory, pvXchange, or taiyangnews.info. No confirmed headquarters, founding date, annual production volume, or independent product certifications were found. The brand may operate as a regional label or a white-label reseller, but without verifiable sources any claim about its market standing would be speculation. AE Solar, by contrast, is a well-documented German manufacturer headquartered in Königsbrunn, Bavaria, founded in 2003 by brothers Alexander, Victor, and Waldemar Maier. The company has appeared on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer list 17 times, including five consecutive years since 2021, and in 2024 BloombergNEF recognized it as Europe's sole Tier 1 manufacturer with high bankability. On institutional footprint alone, AE Solar is in a different league from A.B. Energy. AE Solar addresses residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments through a focused product lineup. Its Meteor series uses N-type TOPCon cell technology and targets both rooftop and ground-mount applications, while the Comet series is built on heterojunction (HJT) technology, delivering efficiency up to 23.05% and output ranging from 630 W to 720 W per panel. Manufacturing spans facilities in Germany and a new 750 MW plant in Manisa, Turkey, commissioned in early 2025, bringing total annual capacity above 2 GW. The company holds DIBt certification - the first Tier 1 manufacturer to do so - and received the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award in 2025, providing independently verified reliability data that project financiers and EPC contractors can act on. For a typical international buyer evaluating these two brands, AE Solar offers a clear, evidence-backed value proposition: confirmed bankability, third-party-tested performance, and a European manufacturing presence that simplifies supply-chain due diligence. A.B. Energy cannot be objectively rated because it does not appear in verifiable industry databases. Any procurement team considering A.B. Energy modules should request current IEC test certificates, independent lab reports, and OEM origin documentation before committing. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs ASM](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-asm) - [AU Optronics vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-a-b-energy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-a-b-energy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.