---
title: "A.B. Energy vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare A.B. Energy vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/a-b-energy-vs-q-cells"
---

# A.B. Energy vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Wiesbaden | Seoul |
| Founded | 1996 | 1999 |
| Employees | 1,400 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | Xetra, Frankfurt Stock Exchange: AB9 | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://abo-energy.com](https://abo-energy.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 89 | +89 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 675 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 468 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.20% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.21% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.325%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | A.B. Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, branded commercially as Hanwha Q CELLS, is a South Korean solar manufacturer under the Hanwha Group conglomerate, with origins in a German photovoltaic R&D company founded in 1999 and acquired by Hanwha in 2012. It carries confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates significant manufacturing in South Korea and the United States, including a 3.3 GW module facility in Cartersville, Georgia - one of the largest in the Western Hemisphere - with total global shipments projected above 9 GW in 2025. A.B. Energy is an Italian firm, registered as A.B. Energy SRLS, focused on energy efficiency and the ecological transition, rooted in 30 years of electrical and electronic equipment experience. Repeated web searches returned no evidence of BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition for A.B. Energy, no independently reviewed panel product lines, and no manufacturing scale comparable to established photovoltaic producers; the company appears to operate primarily as a regional distributor or reseller rather than a vertically integrated module manufacturer. On institutional footprint, Hanwha Q CELLS is substantially larger and more bankable.

Hanwha Q CELLS competes in premium-to-mid-range residential and commercial rooftop segments through its Q.PEAK DUO series, built on proprietary Q.ANTUM DUO Z cell technology - a PERC-based architecture confirmed by multiple independent reviews - with module efficiencies reaching approximately 22.8% and a 25-year product and performance warranty. The company is also actively investing in TOPCon and perovskite-silicon tandem cell production, with its tandem module reportedly achieving 28.6% efficiency for full-area M10 cells in 2025. No verified solar panel product catalog, dominant cell technology, or independently audited specification sheet for A.B. Energy as a photovoltaic manufacturer was found in any credible trade publication or review outlet.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Hanwha Q CELLS is the clear default: it is bankable, broadly reviewed across major installer networks, and backed by US domestic manufacturing with supply-chain resilience. A.B. Energy cannot be responsibly positioned as an equivalent panel manufacturer without independently audited product data - it may serve local Italian markets in a distribution or project-facilitation capacity, but a direct product comparison is not possible on currently available public evidence.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/ \| Hanwha Qcells record tandem cell efficiency and DOE loan 2025 \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/qcells-to-invest-big-in-tandem-solar \| Qcells to invest in tandem solar - TaiyangNews \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [A.B. Energy vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/a-b-energy-vs-ae-solar)
- [AEET vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-q-cells)
- [A.B. Energy vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/a-b-energy-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-q-cells)
- [A.B. Energy vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/a-b-energy-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/a-b-energy-vs-q-cells